Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marian Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$378kHuman Services$133kFood & Nutrition$76kYouth Development$42kHousing & Shelter$31kHealth$27kCrime & Legal$18kCommunity Improvement$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SL$6,100
ENERGY CARE$6,100
Individual grant recipient$6,100
JOES PLACE$6,100
COVENANT HOUSE$6,100
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$6,100
ST ANN OF NORMANDY CHURCH SVDPS$2,100
ST AGATHAS CENTER$2,100
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH$2,100
ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK$2,100
ST PATRICK CENTER$2,100
ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER$2,100
Individual grant recipient$2,100
ALMOST HOME WOMENS SHELTER$2,100
CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION$2,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $5k → 21%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $2k → 21%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $2k → 21%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $2k → 21%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $2k → 21%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $2k → 21%ST AUGUSTINE WELLSTON CENTER: $1k → 21%JOES PLACE: $6k → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $2k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $6k → 21%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $2k → 21%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $2k → 11%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $2k → 11%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $2k → 11%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $2k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 21%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $2k → 11%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $1k → 11%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $1k → 11%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $2k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 21%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $2k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 21%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $2k → 21%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $2k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 21%ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $800 → 11%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $1k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN FAMILY SERV: $1k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$724k · 71 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

71 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
30

Total granted

$724k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+55%

Still filing today

25%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +13%
  • WC
    WELLSTON CENTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $16k · revenue +0%
  • AH
    Almost Home
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • BO
    BIRTHRIGHT OF GREATER KANSAS CITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +55%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF STL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
2
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
3
St Joseph Housing Initiative

As a faith-based organization, our mission is to create vibrant communities through affordable quality housing where low and moderate income families can thrive, prosper and build wealth.

Housing & Shelter
4
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
5
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
6
St Joseph the Worker

Job placement and aftercare services to poor and homeless individuals.

—
7
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
8
Assisi House

The mission of assisi house is to provide housing for previoulsy unhoused individuals in small communal settings where each individual is treated with dignity and respect. the organization is founded on the principal that each individual…

Health
9
Carole's House of Hope

Caroles House of Hope provides transitional living for young women and mothers who have aged out of foster care or have become homeless. Our home-like environment, paired with innovative programs and services, encourages self-sufficiency…

Public Benefit
10
Gateway Homeless Services Inc

To empower adults and families to become independent and permanently housed. the organization provides shelter, food, and other life sustaining materials and activities for destitute families, children and the homeless in the city of st.…

Human Services
11
Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri

Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services
12
St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Patrick Center; the most unlike its peers is Joes Place Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+93 more: $622,177 · Other+93 moreWELLSTON CENTER: $16,341 · Human ServicesWELLSTON …COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $14,541 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $13,541 · Human ServicesST ANDREW…GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $11,041 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN …JOES PLACE CORPORATION: $6,100 · Human ServicesJOES PLAC…+2 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $21,841 · Food & NutritionMISSOURI ENERGYCARE INC: $17,141 · Housing & ShelterCENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION DBA KEYWAY CENTER FOR DIVERSION & REENTRY: $13,741 · Crime & LegalCRIMINAL JUSTICE MINISTRY: $2,100 · Crime & LegalBIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS: $13,741 · Civil RightsCarondelet Community Betterment Federation Inc: $12,741 · Community Improvement
Other$622,177Human Services$64,064Food & Nutrition$21,841Housing & Shelter$17,141Crime & Legal$15,841Civil Rights$13,741Community Improvement$12,741

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $21,841 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI ENERGYCARE INC: $17,141 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetWELLSTON CENTER: $16,341 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetAlmost Home: $16,041 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe German St Vincent Orphan Association: $15,741 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $14,541 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $14,441 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $14,241 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION DBA KEYWAY CENTER FOR DIVERSION & REENTRY: $13,741 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS: $13,741 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF ST LOUIS COUNTY INC: $13,541 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS: $13,541 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $13,241 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCarondelet Community Betterment Federation Inc: $12,741 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $11,841 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $11,041 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJOES PLACE CORPORATION: $6,100 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC: $3,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRIMINAL JUSTICE MINISTRY: $2,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnnie Malone Children and Family Service: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI ENERGYCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home ↗
  • Who funds The German St Vincent Orphan Association ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION DBA KEYWAY CENTER FOR DIVERSION & REENTRY ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF ST LOUIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Carondelet Community Betterment Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO41.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Vatterott Foundation · Pott Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Tsf

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph