Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Margaret Virginia Philip Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$50kArts & Culture$23kEducation$22kEmployment$4kFood & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$120
Median grant
1
States reached
$315k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISTORIC OAKLAND FOUNDATION$3,334
GPB$120
ADOPT A GOLDEN ATLANTA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA: $1k → 13%DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 9 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$97k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+50%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’22’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc
    3× · 2018–2024 · $43k · revenue +40%
  • AS
    Agnes Scott College
    5× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +56%
  • HO
    Historic Oakland Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +50%
  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $366
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
FixGeorgiaPets Inc

To end senseless euthanasia and stop pet over-population in Georgia through targed spay/neuter programming.

Animals
2
Athenspets Inc

Athenspets is an all-volunteer 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to helping the most vulnerable animals in the Athens (GA) area and the people who love them.

Animals
3
Atlanta Animal Rescue Friends Inc

The mission of Atlanta Animal Rescue Friends is to end pet overpopulation. We rescue companion animals and provide veterinary care, subsidize spay/neuter surgeries, and provide humane education to the community.

Animals
4
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…

Human Services
5
Angels Among Us Pet Rescue Inc

Angels among us pet rescue, inc. is a 501(c)(3) charity dedicated to rescuing dogs and cats from shelters and other at-risk situations across georgia. they operate through a network of foster homes in the metro atlanta area and hold pet…

Animals
6
Atlanta Association of Legal Administrators Foundation Inc
—
7
Atlanta Legal Aid Society Inc

Atlanta legal aid provides legal services to the elderly and indigent citizens of the metropolitan atlanta area.

Crime & Legal
8
Forsyth Humane Society

Our mission is to promote and provide for the humane treatment of cats and dogs in Forsyth County. In support of its mission, the Forsyth Humane Society FHS is committed to achieving a save rate of 90 percent for shelter animals in our…

Animals
9
Atlanta Wild Animal Rescue Effort Inc

Rehabilitate georgia's injured and orphaned native wildlife and educate the community about habitat preservation and peaceful coexistence.

Animals
10
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
11
Atlanta Fire Rescue Foundation

To elevate and support atlanta's growing fire and emergency response ecosystem by providing the funding, resources, and development necessary to enhance the personal and professional lives of atlanta firefighters.

—
12
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Angel Dog Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $42,560 · AnimalsAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention o…ANGEL DOG RESCUE INC: $3,000 · AnimalsANGEL DOG RESCUE INC+2 more: $600 · AnimalsAgnes Scott College: $21,706 · OtherAgnes Scott CollegeHistoric Oakland Foundation Inc: $16,009 · OtherHistoric Oakland Foundation IncZOO ATLANTA: $3,419 · OtherZOO ATLANTA+4 more: $886 · OtherThe Theatrical Outfit Inc: $4,171 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $2,177 · Arts & CultureDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Animals$46,160Other$42,020Arts & Culture$6,348Human Services$3,500Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $42,560 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAgnes Scott College: $21,706 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Oakland Foundation Inc: $16,009 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Theatrical Outfit Inc: $4,171 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $2,177 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A GOLDEN ATLANTA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Margaret Virginia Philip Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Margaret Virginia Philip Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Margaret Virginia Philip Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Margaret Virginia Philip Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margaret Virginia Philip’s filings →

    More from the funding graph