Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Margaret Finkel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$428kReligion$222kEducation$151kHealth$141kCrime & Legal$127kHuman Services$115kEnvironment$80kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD OF THE EMERALD COAST$150,420
ALL SPORTS ASSOCIATION$43,200
SILVER SANDS SCHOOL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NITRO ELEMNTARY SCHOOL$10,000
EMERALD COAST FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,800
TOYS FOR TOTS$5,000
ELKS FOUNDATION$3,055
FORT WALTON BEACH HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
FAITHCOAST$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $5k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $5k → 14%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $10k → 11%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
CA
WV
VA
KS
TN
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 28 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
28

Total granted

$1.5M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

39%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $80k · revenue +58%
  • MC
    MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $80k · revenue +89%
  • DH
    DESTIN HIGH SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $66k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • FV
    FRANKVILLE VOUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $45k
  • PC
    PENSACOLA CHABAD JEWISH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OC
    OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Oncology Services Inc

Camp one step by children's oncology services is a leader in providing empowering, supportive, educational, and fun experiences for children (ages birth-19) who have been diagnosed with cancer and their families. we are the only local…

Health
2
Easter Seals Florida Inc

See schedule o for a complete description of the organization's mission

Health
3
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
4
Florida Alliance of Children's Councils & Trusts Inc

To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…

—
5
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
6
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
7
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
8
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
9
Alabama Casa Network Inc

The mission of the alabama casa network, inc. is to equip and empower casa programs to advocate for all of alabama's abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
10
Family Support Services of Suncoast

To be the leader in providing safety, stability, and quality of life for all children by working with the community to strengthen the family unit.

Human Services
11
Florida Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc

To improve florida's response to child abuse by supporting the development, growth and continuation of the children's advocacy centers around florida.

Human Services
12
Candlelighters of the El Paso Area

To provide hope, support, and encouragement to children who have cancer and thier families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Murphy-Harpst Children's Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Walton County Fair Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF THE EMERALD COAST INC: $368,070 · OtherCHABAD OF THE EMERALD COAST INCIndividual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc: $80,000 · OtherSafePath Children's Advocacy Center IncMURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC: $80,000 · OtherMURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO PROTECT CHI: $80,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO PROTECT CHIDESTIN FISHING MUSEUM: $50,000 · OtherELKS LODGE: $45,153 · OtherFRANKVILLE VOUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $45,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $45,000 · Other+42 more: $378,444 · Other+42 moreALL SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC: $145,800 · Recreation & SportsALL SPORTS A…WALTON COUNTY FAIR INC: $37,577 · Recreation & SportsWALTON COUNT…DESTIN HIGH SCHOOL INC: $65,625 · EducationELLISON MCCRANEY INGRAM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,250 · Health+1 more: $300 · HealthMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyChildren of the Night: $20,000 · Human ServicesWESTONWOOD RANCH INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,301,667Recreation & Sports$183,377Education$70,625Health$35,550Philanthropy$35,000Human Services$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC: $145,800 over 4y, 18% of budgetSafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetMURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDESTIN HIGH SCHOOL INC: $65,625 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWALTON COUNTY FAIR INC: $37,577 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetChildren of the Night: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWESTONWOOD RANCH INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetEMERALD COAST CRIME STOPPERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetELLISON MCCRANEY INGRAM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetShining Light Homes: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds DESTIN HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WALTON COUNTY FAIR INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds WESTONWOOD RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Margaret Finkel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Margaret Finkel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 81%
  • Emerald Coast Crime Stoppers Inc: 81% of income from government
  • Destin High School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Margaret Finkel’s filings →

More from the funding graph