Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$269k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.3MHealth$402kEnvironment$344kScience & Tech$344kHuman Services$213kFood & Nutrition$182kEducation$160kYouth Development$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $420k
  • $250k+1 grant · $269k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Louis Symphony Foundation$269,000
St Louis Area Food Bank$84,000
St Louis Art Museum$84,000
Missouri Botanical Garden$84,000
Oasis Institute$84,000
St Louis Science Center$84,000
Bethesdal Health Group Foundation$48,000
Washington University$35,000
Sheldon Art Foundation$30,000
Goldfarb School of Nursing$30,000
Opera Theatre of St Louis$30,000
Foundation for Fighting Blindness$24,000
Character Plus$24,000
St Andrews Society for Seniors$18,000
Loaves and Fishes$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Oasis Institute: $84k → 11%Oasis Institute: $6k → 11%Oasis Institute: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 23 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
1

Total granted

$4.0M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

52%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    5× · 2019–2025 · $344k · revenue +11%
  • OT
    Opera Theatre of Saint Louis
    5× · 2019–2025 · $290k · revenue +250%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $145k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • BH
    BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $48k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Municipal Theatre Association of St Louis

The muny is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to enrich lives by producing exceptional musical theatre accessible to all, continuing its remarkable tradition in forest park.

Arts & Culture
2
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
3
St Louis Art Museum Foundation

The sole purpose of the foundation is to support the saint louis art museum, including but not limited to fundraising and other activities and assisting in financing expansion and renovation of its facilities.

Arts & Culture
4
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
5
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
6
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
7
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
9
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
St Louis Science Center Foundation

Support the st. louis science center and its comprehensive array of educational outreach programs to the community in order to increase interest, understanding and enthusiasm for stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).

Science & Tech
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Louis Symphony Foundation: $1,119,000 · OtherSt Louis Symphony FoundationSt Louis Art Museum: $344,000 · OtherSt Louis Art MuseumSt Louis Science Center: $344,000 · OtherSt Louis Science CenterBethesda Health Home Foundation: $150,000 · OtherBethesda Health Home FoundationST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $134,000 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INCSt Andrews Society for Seniors: $108,000 · OtherGoldfarb School of Nursing: $105,000 · Other+5 more: $166,500 · Other+5 moreOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $290,000 · Arts & CultureOpera Theatre of Sa…MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $267,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTORICAL…THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FO…GRAND CENTER INC: $51,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND CENTER INC+1 more: $17,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $344,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI B…Forest Park Forever Inc: $32,000 · EnvironmentForest Par…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $145,000 · EducationCHARACTERPLUS: $64,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $99,000 · HealthBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $48,000 · HealthTHE OASIS INSTITUTE: $105,000 · Human Services
Other$2,470,500Arts & Culture$705,000Environment$376,000Education$209,000Health$147,000Human Services$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $344,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $290,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $267,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $145,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $134,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OASIS INSTITUTE: $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $99,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHARACTERPLUS: $64,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGRAND CENTER INC: $51,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $48,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OASIS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARACTERPLUS ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Stanley & Lucy Lopata Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission · Centene Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margaret Blanke Grigg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph