Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$269k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$2.3MHealth$402kEnvironment$344kScience & Tech$344kHuman Services$213kFood & Nutrition$182kEducation$160kYouth Development$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $420k
  • $250k+1 grant · $269k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Louis Symphony Foundation$269,000
Missouri Botanical Garden$84,000
St Louis Art Museum$84,000
St Louis Science Center$84,000
Oasis Institute$84,000
St Louis Area Food Bank$84,000
Bethesdal Health Group Foundation$48,000
Washington University$35,000
Opera Theatre of St Louis$30,000
Goldfarb School of Nursing$30,000
Sheldon Art Foundation$30,000
Character Plus$24,000
Foundation for Fighting Blindness$24,000
St Andrews Society for Seniors$18,000
Loaves and Fishes$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Oasis Institute: $84k → 11%Oasis Institute: $6k → 11%Oasis Institute: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 23 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$3.6M
$393k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    5× · 2019–2025 · $344k · revenue +37%
  • OT
    Opera Theatre of Saint Louis
    5× · 2019–2025 · $290k · revenue +13%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $145k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SL
    St. Louis Symphony Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $225k
  • SL
    St. Louis Art Museum
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • SL
    St. Louis Science Center
    one grant, 2022 · $70k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Municipal Theatre Association of St Louis

The muny is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to enrich lives by producing exceptional musical theatre accessible to all, continuing its remarkable tradition in forest park.

Arts & Culture
2
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
3
St Louis Art Museum Foundation

The sole purpose of the foundation is to support the saint louis art museum, including but not limited to fundraising and other activities and assisting in financing expansion and renovation of its facilities.

Arts & Culture
4
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
5
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
6
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
7
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

9
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
St Louis Science Center Foundation

Support the st. louis science center and its comprehensive array of educational outreach programs to the community in order to increase interest, understanding and enthusiasm for stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).

Science & Tech
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees and the most unlike its peers is The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Louis Symphony Foundation — $894,000 · OtherSt Louis Symphony FoundationSt Louis Art Museum — $274,000 · OtherSt Louis Art MuseumSt Louis Science Center — $274,000 · OtherSt Louis Science CenterSt. Louis Symphony Foundation — $225,000 · OtherSt. Louis Symphony FoundationBethesda Health Home Foundation — $150,000 · OtherBethesda Health Home FoundationST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $134,000 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INCGoldfarb School of Nursing — $105,000 · OtherSt Andrews Society for Seniors — $83,000 · Other+9 more — $331,500 · Other+9 moreOpera Theatre of Saint Louis — $290,000 · Arts & CultureOpera Theatre of Sa…MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $267,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTORICAL…THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION — $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FO…GRAND CENTER INC — $51,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND CENTER INC+1 more — $17,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $344,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI B…Forest Park Forever Inc — $32,000 · EnvironmentForest Par…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $145,000 · EducationCHARACTERPLUS — $64,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $99,000 · HealthBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $48,000 · HealthTHE OASIS INSTITUTE — $105,000 · Human Services
Other$2,470,500Arts & Culture$705,000Environment$376,000Education$209,000Health$147,000Human Services$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $344,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis — $290,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $267,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $145,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $134,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OASIS INSTITUTE — $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $99,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHARACTERPLUS — $64,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGRAND CENTER INC — $51,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $48,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds THE OASIS INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHARACTERPLUS
  • Who funds GRAND CENTER INC
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc
  • Who funds ST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Stanley & Lucy Lopata Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission · Centene Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Margaret Blanke Grigg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph