Skip to content

· Public charity

The Marcus Allen Foundation

Our mission is to use our platform to support organizations who provide economic assistance to underprivileged children using sports as an outlet.

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Youth Development$200kRecreation & Sports$105kHuman Services$55kEducation$55kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$23kArts & Culture$10kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $165,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $195,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$494k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA$25,000
JACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION$25,000
YOUNG WARRIORS$25,000
LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$12,500
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE$12,500
COMMUNITY CANCER FUND$10,000
HAPPY HABITS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE LIFE RING FOUNDATION$10,000
MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $10k → 11%MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of The Marcus Allen Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 17%.

The Marcus Allen Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 3 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +125% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$260k
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+0%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JJ
    JACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $110k · revenue +125%
  • LS
    LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $95k · revenue -41%
  • LH
    LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AS
    ALL STAR FOR HELPING KIDS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • AS
    ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc

The cal ripken, sr. foundation helps to strengthen america's most underserved and distressed communities by supporting and advocating for children, building youth development parks, partnering with law enforcement and youth service…

Education
2
Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports
3
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
4
Mary Kay Ash Foundation

Provide support for irc sec 501(c)(3) organizations involved in raising and distributing funds to invest in breakthrough cancer research and clinical trials to find a cure for women-related cancers and ending domestic violence.

Philanthropy
5
Fresh Start Caring for Kids Foundation

Fresh start caring for kids foundation provides no-cost medical services to kids with physical deformities caused by birth defects, injury, abuse or disease through surgical weekends and clinics. medical services are donated by doctors,…

—
6
World Childhood Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Human Services
7
The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc

The Childrens Cancer Foundation, Inc. (Organization) is a charitable, not-for-profit corporation committed to funding locally-based researchers, programs and facilities until every child is assured a healthy cancer free future. The…

—
8
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
9
The Heal Los Angeles Foundation

To improve the lives of young people in greater los angeles by creating impactful programs that will help them pursue their dreams while building fundamental life skills.

Education
10
Michael Hoefflin Foundation

The michael hoefflin foundation for children's cancer is a public non profit 501(c)3 foundation that provides financial and emotional support to children and their families in the santa clarita valley, antelope valley, san fernando…

Health
11
The Jason Kidd Foundation

To empower young women and create equality for female athletes in the sport of basketball and beyond the court.

Recreation & Sports
12
Warrior Kids Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mark Wahlberg Youth Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Miracle House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherLINCOLN HIGH SCHOOLJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $25,000 · OtherJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION SUPPORT OR…ALL STAR FOR HELPING KIDS: $20,000 · OtherALL STAR FOR HELPING KIDSALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC: $20,000 · OtherALL STARS HELPING KIDS INCFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS: $15,000 · OtherFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTSMILTON TIPOFF CLUB: $10,000 · OtherMILTON TIPOFF CLUBTAMARA AND EDWARD GEORGE LEGACY FUND: $10,000 · OtherTAMARA AND EDWARD GEORGE LEGACY FUNDSPEEDWAY CHILDRENS CHARITY: $10,000 · OtherSPEEDWAY CHILDRENS CHARITYHAPPY HABITS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherHAPPY HABITS FOUNDATIONTRACEY BILETNIKOFF FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTRACEY BILETNIKOFF FOUNDATIONJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATIO…YOUNG WARRIORS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG WARRIORSLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA: $95,000 · Recreation & SportsLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOO…THE MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIRACL…COMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …THE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE MARK W…TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyLIFE RING FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $12,500 · Health
Other$185,000Youth Development$135,000Recreation & Sports$95,000Human Services$45,000Philanthropy$22,500Health$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA: $95,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG WARRIORS: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE RING FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marcus Allen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marcus Allen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marcus Allen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marcus Allen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marcus Allen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph