Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
27%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,200
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 14
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$543k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 27% of the organizations The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 7% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$48k31%
FY202411$72k27%
FY202310$45k10%
FY202213$48k31%
FY202111$84k36%
FY202014$48k57%
FY201913$42kn/a
89% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Civil Rights$127kArts & Culture$125kEducation$52kReligion$36kPhilanthropy$33kAnimals$6kHealth$5kInternational$2kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 19 recipients with no EIN on record ($135k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPhiladelphia Orchestra Association: $113,718 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Jewish Committee: $78,265 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAssociated Alumni of Central High School of Philadelphia: $13,207 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Morris Animal Refuge: $6,278 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTemple Hillel: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc: $1,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rock School for Dance Education: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Institute for National Security of America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShriners Hospitals for Children: $525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Emergency Alliance: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhyy Inc: $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWeitzman National Museum of American Jewish History: $269 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Physicians of Philadelphia: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Legion: $129 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSimon Wiesenthal Center Inc: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation with peer funders

About The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation

How much does The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation give?
The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $48,345 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 14 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Civil Rights (32%), Arts & Culture (31%), Education (13%).
Who are The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Philadelphia Orchestra Association ($114k), American Jewish Committee ($78k), Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel ($31k).
Does The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation based?
The Malmud-Kravitz Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Malmud-Kravitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph