· Private foundation
The M K Owens Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $8,624 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $7,025 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $6,349 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $5,460 |
| SANTA FE LACROSSE | $5,250 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $4,978 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $4,180 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $4,080 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $3,992 |
| DESERT LABRADOR RETREIVER RESCUE | $2,500 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $2,023 |
| THE OWENS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | $481 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +795% since the first grant, against +73% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WRWood River Community YMCA3× · 2017–2019 · $37k
- ASANIMAL SHELTER - WOOD RIVER VALLEY2× · 2017–2018 · $14k
- BFBROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA6× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- ASANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +44%
- HIHe Intends Victoryone grant, 2022 · $515 · revenue +2%
- BCBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +217%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
Animal rescue
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
Meridian Canine Rescue's mission is to save animals' lives through storytelling and education. We focus primarily on individual dogs and their unique behaviors as we provide resources to the public, facilitate adoptions, and train…
Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…
The mission of Border Animal Rescue, Inc (BAR) is the reduction of animal overpopulation through spay and neuter programs and to promote the adoption of unwanted, homeless pets by caring for them in foster homes, providing medical care,…
To rescue and save homeless, unwanted, abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.
Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.
Providing a helping hand to homeless pets in our community. As an all-volunteer, 501c3 organization, we rely on donations from foundations, local businesses, and individuals like you. Join us and support our life saving programs today.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Broadcasters Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Arizona Media Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE ↗
- Who funds DESERT LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Media Association ↗
- Who funds He Intends Victory ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds MARE Riding Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The M K Owens Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The M K Owens Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The M K Owens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.