Skip to content
The Lynn and Richard Bleil Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Lynn and Richard Bleil Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$287kHealth$216kEducation$171kRecreation & Sports$18kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$27,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEOPLES HEALTH CLINIC$55,000
INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY$27,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%VA HUDSON VALLEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $1k → 9%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS: $4k → 5%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $27k → 8%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY: $3k → 5%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $73k → 5%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $5k → 8%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%STANFORD ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $695 → 8%PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $63k → 5%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $5k → 8%PEOPLES HEALTH CLINIC: $55k → 5%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $4k → 8%PEOPLES HEALTH CLINIC: $50k → 5%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $2k → 8%PEOPLES HEALTH CLINIC: $50k → 5%ROWLAND HALL: $10k → 8%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $36k → 5%ROWLAND HALL: $3k → 8%PEOPLES HEALTH CLINIC: $28k → 5%ROWLAND HALL: $1k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $25k → 5%PEOPLES HEALTH CLINIC: $25k → 5%PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $24k → 5%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20k → 5%PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 5%US SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION: $18k → 5%PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 5%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 5%BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 5%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%BEETHOVEN FESTIVAL OF PARK CITY: $1k → 5%PARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $50 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$416k · 5 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$416k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+6%

Still filing today

80%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    People's Health Clicnic
    5× · 2020–2025 · $208k · revenue +166%
  • PC
    Park City Education Foundation
    6× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +70%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    3× · 2018–2021 · $26k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IF
    INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • US
    US SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
9
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
10
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Princeton University; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

People's Health Clicnic: $207,500 · HealthPeople's Health ClicnicBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 · HealthPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $194,000 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPark City Education Foundation: $101,000 · EducationPark City Education Found…The Trustees of Princeton University: $26,075 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF …ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $13,700 · EducationROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SC…+2 more: $4,000 · EducationINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION PARK CITY: $67,700 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDA…INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDA…US SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherUS SKI & SNOWBOARD T…BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURES SCHOL…+6 more: $7,545 · Other+6 more
Health$215,000Philanthropy$194,000Education$159,775Other$128,245

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $207,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $194,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPark City Education Foundation: $101,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $26,075 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $13,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Park City Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lynn and Richard Bleil Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lynn and Richard Bleil Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lynn and Richard Bleil’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home