· Private foundation
The Luckyday Foundation Trustmark National Bank Trustee
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of THE LUCKYDAY FOUNDATION TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
- $250k+3 grants · $6.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USM FOUNDATION- LUCKY DAY SCHOLARS PROGRAM | $2,400,289 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION | $2,247,500 |
| MSU FOUNDATION | $1,674,813 |
| THE GLEANERS INC | $15,000 |
| HINDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES | $12,000 |
| MS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $7,500 |
| THE WILSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK | $6,000 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $5,000 |
| LAUREN ROGER'S MUSEUM OF ART | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $18M · revenue +57%
- SCSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $562k · revenue +95%
- TWTHE WILSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $484k · revenue +84% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- EWEudora Welty Foundation Incone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -64% · 40% of their budget
- MMMS MUSEUM OF ARTone grant, 2021 · $150k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL MSone grant, 2023 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support the research activities of the university of mississippi medical center
To provide a broad spectrum of programs and program services to meet the needs of mississippi children and adults with disabilities, thus enabling them to achieve maximum independence and gain the greatest quility of life.
The organization provides funding for medical research, educational programs for physicians and others as well as educational assistance for medical students. in addition, the organization provides grants to medical professionals whose…
The foundation was established to support the mississippi museum of natural science though receiving, maintaining and distributing funds exclusively for the benefit of the museum.
To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.
The foundation exists to cultivate and administer current and deferred gifts for the benefit of ms united methodist related institutions, agencies, local churches, and other ministries for charitable purposes and support and to educate…
To conduct fundraising efforts to help support and promote the activities, programs and projects of the mississippi department of archives and history.
Seeking to build relationships with diverse institutions around the state to build the power to effect political change in a non-partisan way while strengthening the institutions we engage with to help execute their institution's mission…
Mississippi gulf coast chamber of commerce, inc., a mississippi non-profit corporation (the "chamber") connects, informs, advocates and develops. the chamber is a membership organization that fosters leadership and the advancement of the…
Jmg's mission is to keep young people in school through graduation and provide work-based learning experiences that will lead to career advancement opportunities or to enroll in a postsecondary institution that leads to a rewarding career.
Provide free medical services to uninsured individuals.
To support medical missions in haiti.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Food Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Manna House Inc 323 N Main St. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HINDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Eudora Welty Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BUT GOD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MANNA HOUSE INC 323 N MAIN ST ↗
- Who funds The Mustard Seed Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS MUSEUMS OF SCIENCE & HISTORY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Selby and Richard McRae Foundation · Ergon Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Old Ladies Home Association · Walker Foundation · Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender Trustee · Jackson-Newell Foundation Inc · T H Etheridge Trust · Kathryn & Julian Wiener Fund · Howard & Mary Eliza McMillan Foundation · Wesley a Caldwell Foundation Inc · Hf McCarty Jr Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Luckyday Foundation Trustmark National Bank Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Luckyday Foundation Trustmark National Bank Trustee?
Find your warmest path to The Luckyday Foundation Trustmark National Bank Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.