Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lu Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$218k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$416kInternational$203kHuman Services$181kArts & Culture$156kPublic Benefit$123kCivil Rights$70kHealth$70kHousing & Shelter$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $134k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$11,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT ANGEL HEART$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$40,000
PRO PUBLICA$27,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Foundation for National Progress$20,000
Chinese Hospital San Francisco$11,000
SafeHouse Denver Inc$10,000
STATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE$8,500
Adopt a Family of Palm Beach$8,500
URBAN PEAK$7,500
Tennessee Children's Home$5,000
QUINCY INSTITUTE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Tennessee Children's Home: $5k → 10%Tennessee Children's Home: $5k → 10%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $25k → 12%SafeHouse Denver Inc: $10k → 12%SafeHouse Denver Inc: $10k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $9k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $8k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $8k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $8k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+335%

Still filing today

59%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalArts & CulturePublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL HEART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $405k · revenue +138%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $203k · revenue +98%
  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $156k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • C
    CROSSPURPOSEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +335%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
2
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
3
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
8
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
9
Meta House Inc

Meta house ends the generational cycle of addiction by healing women and strengthening families.

—
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Publica Inc; the most unlike its peers is Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT ANGEL HEART: $405,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGEL HEART+1 more: $11,000 · Community ImprovementIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…URBAN PEAK: $46,500 · OtherURBAN PEAKAdopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: $42,500 · OtherAdopt-A-Family of the…Chinese Hospital San Francisco: $22,000 · OtherChinese Hospital San …Adopt a Family of Palm Beach: $17,000 · OtherAdopt a Family of Pal…QUINCY INSTITUTE: $15,000 · OtherQUINCY INSTITUTERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $203,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…PRO PUBLICA INC: $155,500 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA …The Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $123,000 · Public BenefitThe Center…SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $83,500 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesTENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE: $70,000 · Civil RightsCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $47,500 · Health
Community Improvement$416,000Other$268,000International$203,000Arts & Culture$155,500Public Benefit$123,000Human Services$106,000Civil Rights$70,000Health$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $405,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $203,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $155,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $123,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $83,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetSTATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE: $70,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAdopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: $42,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Adopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lu Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lu Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lu’s filings →

More from the funding graph