Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lowrie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Recreation & Sports$95kEducation$81kYouth Development$58kHuman Services$9kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$683k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$17,500
PROJECT BEISBOL$10,000
PARRISH LITTLE LEAGUE$7,559
LAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE$5,000
SPORT OREGON FOUNDATION$3,000
BECAUSE BASEBALL$2,500
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$1,500
OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $18k → 8%BASEBALL FOR ALL: $2k → 14%CHILDREN'S MUESEUM OF HOUSTON: $9k → 16%PROJECT BEISBOL: $10k → 13%MORE THAN BASEBALL: $5k → 17%RIVERDALE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $2k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 12%PRINCESTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%OUR BASEBALL LIFE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $10k → 13%MORE THAN BASEBALL: $3k → 17%RIVERDALE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $2k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 12%PRINCESTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%OUR BASEBALL LIFE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%BUCK CARDINAL CLUB: $8k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $10k → 13%LAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE: $5k → 8%SPORT OREGON FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $10k → 13%LAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE: $3k → 8%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $9k → 13%LAKE OSWEGO GIRLS SOFTBALL: $3k → 8%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%BUCK CARDINAL CLUB: $5k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $4k → 13%LAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE: $3k → 8%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%BUCK CARDINAL CLUB: $3k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $4k → 13%LAKE OSWEGO GIRLS SOFTBALL: $3k → 8%BECAUSE BASEBALL: $3k → 7%BUCK CARDINAL CLUB: $3k → 8%PROJECT BEISBOL: $3k → 13%LAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE: $3k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%LAKE OSWEGO GIRLS SOFTBALL: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$183k · 13 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$183k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsInternationalEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PROJECT BEISBOL CORP
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +54%
  • RS
    RIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +1%
  • BB
    Because Baseball Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUESEUM OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • BF
    BASEBALL FOR ALL INC ATTN JUSTINE SIEGAL
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
Oxford Recreational Baseball Assoc

Orba is an instructional baseball league

Recreation & Sports
3
Baseball Beyond Borders

To expand access and opportunity for youth through baseball, empowering them with life skills, academic pathways, and leadership beyond the game.

Recreation & Sports
4
Perfect Play Athletics Foundation
5
Elite Sandlot Baseball
6
Ocean Surge Travel Baseball Association
Recreation & Sports
7
Build Our Ballpark Inc

To improve the lives of kids by providing the opportunity to play baseball and softball which, through teamwork, strengthens character, builds pride and teaches skills for life.

Recreation & Sports
8
Navy-Ortega-Lakeshore Little League

Sanctioned Little League baseball and softball for girls boys ages 6-18

9
Next Level Baseball

Support to athletes in need

Recreation & Sports
10
Legacy Youth Sports Fellowship

Fostering youth sports and competition

Recreation & Sports
11
Little League Baseball Inc

Little League Baseball

12
Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League

The Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League offers recreational and competitive fastpitch softball for players in kindergarten through 9th grade. We are a nonprofit, all-volunteer league focused on providing a positive athletic experience…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oregon Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BUCK CARDINAL CLUB — $28,500 · OtherBUCK CARDINAL CLUBLAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE — $12,500 · OtherLAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUEIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S MUESEUM OF HOUSTON — $9,350 · OtherCHILDREN'S MUESEUM OF HOUSTONPARRISH LITTLE LEAGUE — $7,559 · OtherPARRISH LITTLE LEAGUELAKE OSWEGO GIRLS SOFTBALL — $7,500 · OtherLAKE OSWEGO GIRLS SOFTBALLMORE THAN BASEBALL INC — $7,500 · OtherMORE THAN BASEBALL INCPRINCESTON UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · OtherPRINCESTON UNIVERSITYOUR BASEBALL LIFE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherPROJECT BEISBOL CORP — $58,204 · InternationalPROJECT BEISBOL CORPTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $45,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF…CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION…Because Baseball Inc — $17,500 · Recreation & SportsBecause Bas…Oregon Sports Authority Foundation — $4,500 · Recreation & SportsOregon Spor…OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsOREGON ADAP…RIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,000 · AnimalsBASEBALL FOR ALL INC ATTN JUSTINE SIEGAL — $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$93,909International$58,204Education$55,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Philanthropy$20,000Animals$3,000Youth Development$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROJECT BEISBOL CORP — $58,204 over 7y, 10% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBecause Baseball Inc — $17,500 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetLAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE — $12,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORE THAN BASEBALL INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOregon Sports Authority Foundation — $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBASEBALL FOR ALL INC ATTN JUSTINE SIEGAL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT BEISBOL CORP
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds RIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Because Baseball Inc
  • Who funds LAKE OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE
  • Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MORE THAN BASEBALL INC
  • Who funds Oregon Sports Authority Foundation
  • Who funds OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds BASEBALL FOR ALL INC ATTN JUSTINE SIEGAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lowrie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lowrie Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lowrie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph