Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Louis B Mayer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$583k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$2.1MHealth$939kPhilanthropy$244kScience & Tech$45kEducation$22k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $343k
$40,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
George Eastman Museum$85,000
American Cinematheque$57,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$51,000
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center$50,000
George Eastman Museum$50,000
Northeast Historic Film$50,000
Association of Moving Image Archivi$47,500
UC Berkeley Art MuseumPacific Film$45,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$40,000
Cincinnati Children's Hospital$30,000
UC Berkeley Art MuseumPacific Film$25,000
Arts Resources in Collaboration Inc$20,000
Columbia University$11,000
George Eastman Museum$10,000
Arts Resources in Collaboration Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $50k → 7%UC Berkeley Art MuseumPacific Film: $45k → 10%Film Preservation Society: $39k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $101k → 14%MD Anderson Cancer Center: $51k → 16%Miami City Ballet: $100k → 15%Vanguard Charitable: $196k → 7%Cincinnati Children's Hospital: $35k → 16%Northeast Historic Film: $50k → 11%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $50k → 7%UCLA Film and Television Archive: $60k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $85k → 14%MD Anderson Cancer Center: $50k → 16%Miami City Ballet: $50k → 15%Vanguard Charitable: $49k → 7%Cincinnati Children's Hospital: $30k → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $50k → 7%UCLA Film and Television Archive: $55k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $82k → 14%MD Anderson Cancer Center: $40k → 16%Miami City Ballet: $50k → 15%Cincinnati Children's Hospital: $30k → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $50k → 7%UCLA Film and Television Archive: $45k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $80k → 14%Miami City Ballet: $50k → 15%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $45k → 7%George Eastman Museum: $65k → 14%Miami City Ballet: $41k → 15%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $30k → 7%George Eastman Museum: $50k → 14%Miami City Ballet: $36k → 15%Cedars-Sinai Medical Center: $50k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $40k → 14%The LA County Museum of Natural His: $40k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $40k → 14%Cedars-Sinai Medical Center: $45k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $37k → 14%The LA County Museum of Natural His: $40k → 14%George Eastman Museum: $30k → 14%Memorial Sloan Kettering: $48k → 17%Memorial Sloan Kettering: $35k → 17%American Cinematheque: $57k → 14%Museum of Modern Art: $92k → 17%Association of Moving Image Archivi: $48k → 14%Museum of Modern Art: $70k → 17%Museum of Modern Art: $70k → 17%Mt Sinai Medical Center: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
OH
RI
CA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Louis B Mayer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 38% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 35% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Louis B Mayer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 12 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$2.8M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+83%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $707k · revenue +47%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $375k · revenue +73%
  • MC
    MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $327k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MS
    Mt Sinai Medical Center
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • FP
    FILM PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $39k · revenue -24%
  • PT
    PAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of the Moving Image

See schedule omuseum of the moving image (momi) is the only museum in the u.s. that explores the central technology of the present moment.screens are all around us. we use them to educate, entertain, and communicate. the moving…

Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
Academy Museum Foundation

The academy museum of motion pictures advances the understanding, celebration, and preservation of cinema through inclusive and accessible exhibitions, screenings, programs, initiatives, and collections. welcoming visitors from los angeles…

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
6
California Institute of Contemporary Art
7
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
8
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Computer History Museum

Chm decodes technology - its computing past, digital present, and future impact on humanity.

Arts & Culture
10
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
11
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
12
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is George Eastman Museum and the most unlike its peers is Film Preservation Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM — $706,600 · Arts & CultureGEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUMMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $326,900 · Arts & CultureMIAMI CITY BALLET INCMuseum of Modern Art — $232,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtAMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE — $57,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $64,000 · Arts & CultureUC Berkeley Art MuseumPacific Film — $270,000 · OtherUC Berkeley Art MuseumPacific FilmUCLA Film and Television Archive — $210,000 · OtherUCLA Film and Television ArchiveMD Anderson Cancer Center — $141,000 · OtherMD Anderson Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering — $133,210 · OtherMemorial Sloan KetteringARTS RESOURCES IN COLLABORATION INC — $125,000 · OtherARTS RESOURCES IN COLLABORATION INCCincinnati Children's Hospital — $120,000 · OtherCincinnati Children's HospitalThe LA County Museum of Natural His — $80,000 · OtherThe LA County Museum of Natural HisNORTHEAST HISTORIC FILM — $50,000 · OtherMt Sinai Medical Center — $50,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF MOVING IMAGE ARCHIVISTS — $47,500 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $375,000 · HealthDana-Farber Canc…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $120,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MED…VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $244,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $22,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$1,386,500Other$1,226,710Health$495,000Philanthropy$244,000Education$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM — $706,600 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $375,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $326,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $244,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $232,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTS RESOURCES IN COLLABORATION INC — $125,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST HISTORIC FILM — $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MOVING IMAGE ARCHIVISTS — $47,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFILM PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC — $39,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art
  • Who funds ARTS RESOURCES IN COLLABORATION INC
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE
  • Who funds NORTHEAST HISTORIC FILM
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF MOVING IMAGE ARCHIVISTS
  • Who funds FILM PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds PAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Louis B Mayer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Louis B Mayer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Louis B Mayer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph