Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lottsamford Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$119kYouth Development$83kReligion$31kCommunity Improvement$17kArts & Culture$16kScience & Tech$12kEnvironment$11kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL$30,000
THE FAY SCHOOL$15,000
MOBILE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,000
ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH$4,000
DRUG EDUCATION COUNCIL$3,750
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS$1,000
YOUNG LIFE$1,000
DAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB$500
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - FARRA LAW SCHOOL$500
DAUPHIN ISLAND FOUNDATION$250
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY: $1k → 17%SMS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%DRUG EDUCATION COUNCIL: $4k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 18%ARCHWAY: $10k → 16%DRUG EDUCATION COUNCIL: $4k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 18%THE FAY SCHOOL: $15k → 16%MOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $13k → 18%MOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $13k → 18%MOBILE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $5k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $1k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $5k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $1k → 19%THE VILLAGE GREEN: $3k → 18%CASHIERS AREA LEGACY FUND: $2k → 18%DAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB: $8k → 19%DAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB: $3k → 19%DAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB: $1k → 19%UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $30k → 19%UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $30k → 19%UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $11k → 19%UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10k → 19%UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10k → 19%UMS WRIGHT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10k → 19%DAUPHIN ISLAND FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%YOUNG LIFE: $3k → 19%YOUNG LIFE: $1k → 19%YOUNG LIFE: $1k → 19%YOUNG LIFE: $1k → 19%ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $7k → 19%ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $6k → 19%ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $5k → 19%ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $5k → 19%ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $5k → 19%MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 19%ST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $4k → 19%VILLAGE OF SPRINGHILL: $3k → 19%VILLAGE OF SPRINGHILL: $3k → 19%VILLAGE OF SPRINGHILL: $3k → 19%MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART: $2k → 19%WILMER HALL: $2k → 19%MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART: $2k → 19%MOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 14 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$280k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+42%

Still filing today

64%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $101k · revenue +28%
  • MM
    MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +79%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • A
    ARCHWAY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +131%
  • MC
    MOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Medical Foundation of Alabama

To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects

—
2
Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Promote charitable, educational, scientific, and cultural activities in the city of montgomery, alabama.

Community Improvement
3
Mobile Area Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

To promote scouting in the south alabama area

Youth Development
4
Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce

Community and economic development

—
5
Mississippi Museum of Art Foundation

Development of cultural and artistic enlightenment

—
6
Calhoun County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promotion of the economic development of calhoun county, alabama

—
7
Mobile Baykeeper Inc

Provide citizens a means to protect the beauty, health and heritage of the Mobile Bay Watershed, Alabamas waterways and coastal communities.

Environment
8
Mobile Symphony Inc

The purpose of the organization is to make lives better through music by producing and promoting symphonic music and delivering music education programs throughout Alabama and the Gulf Coast region.

Arts & Culture
9
Maritime & Seafood Industry Museum

To preserve and interpret the maritime history and heritage of biloxi and the mississippi gulf coast.

Arts & Culture
10
Alabama Forestry Foundation

The alabama forestry association works to promote good stewardship of our renewable forest resources for the benefit of society, our members, and the forest products industry.

Environment
11
Mobile Bar Association

To elevate the legal profession to the highest possible standards, regulate its practice, and provide continuing legal education to its members.

—
12
Greenville Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member organization whose purpose is to promote commerce and business in the greenville alabama area

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Village of Spring Hill Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Fay School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION: $101,000 · OtherUMS-WRIGHT CORPORATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $75,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCH: $31,000 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISPOCAL CHURCHThe Fay School: $15,000 · OtherThe Fay SchoolDAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB: $12,250 · OtherARCHWAY: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $30,000 · Other+7 moreTHE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC: $9,000 · Community ImprovementMOBILE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCASHIERS AREA LEGACY FUND INC: $2,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $500 · Community ImprovementMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $5,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIFE: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentMOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsSouth Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program: $4,250 · Crime & LegalMOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropySMS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · Environment
Other$274,250Community Improvement$16,500Arts & Culture$15,500Youth Development$7,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Crime & Legal$4,250Philanthropy$3,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION: $101,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fay School: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC: $9,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDrug Education Council Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDAUPHIN ISLAND FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouth Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program: $4,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetENVISION OPELIKA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The Fay School ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Drug Education Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAUPHIN ISLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds South Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASHIERS AREA LEGACY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SMS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION OPELIKA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ee Delaney Foundation IncAL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ee Delaney Foundation Inc · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The David J Cooper Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · Doy & Margaret McCall Family Foundation · Ws Foundation Inc Blacksher White-Spunner · Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lottsamford Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lottsamford Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lottsamford Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lottsamford Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lottsamford Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph