Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Loring Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$305kHuman Services$185kEducation$110kYouth Development$59kHousing & Shelter$29kInternational$18kCommunity Improvement$10kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACTING TOMORROW INC$30,000
SEAN LORING CLASSIC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$15,612
CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$3,500
SPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER$3,500
RIDE CINCINNATI$3,000
KAREN WELLINGTON FOUNDATION$2,000
SOBER LIVING INC$2,000
LOVESOME STABLES INC$2,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCIN$2,000
KINDERVELT 50CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S$2,000
CINCINNATI YOUTH COLLABORATIVE$2,000
HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI$1,125
HAYMAKERS FOR HOPE$1,000
BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IMPACTING TOMORROW INC: $30k → 9%BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $5k → 15%LOVESOME STABLES INC: $20k → 13%BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $5k → 15%LOVESOME STABLES INC: $20k → 13%BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $3k → 15%LOVESOME STABLES INC: $2k → 13%BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $2k → 15%LOVESOME STABLES INC: $2k → 13%BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $1k → 15%NEW PATH: $4k → 16%NEW PATH: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$648k · 20 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$648k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+80%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $74k · revenue +110%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $70k · revenue +3%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI
    7× · 2018–2024 · $66k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • OE
    OASIS ELITE BOXING CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • RC
    RIDE CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +80%
  • DP
    DEER PARK COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COR
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Cleveland's Children
2
Hope Ignites Cincinnati

Hope Ignites Cincinnati nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others through its holistic, long-term residential and academy programming. The organization provides direct…

3
The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged
4
Breakthrough Cincinnati Inc

Provide a rigorous four-year college-preparatory summer learning program for high-need and high-potential middle school students and inspire and train college students as the next generation of teachers.

Community Improvement
5
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
6
Givehope Pancreatic Cancer Research

Givehope is an entirely volunteer-run organization that supports southwest ohio cancer patients and their families, as well as local cancer researchers at the university of cincinnati.

Health
7
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
8
Level Up Cincinnati

LUC's mission is to empower underserved students, particularly first-gen students from low-income families, to thrive in education and professional careers. The program addresses critical challenges faced by these students, such as higher…

Education
9
Upspring

To empower children experiencing homelessness by providing opportunities for education and enrichment.

Youth Development
10
Trinity Health System Group

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

11
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
12
Cincinnati Works

Cincinnati works brings hope and encouragement to people living in poverty while assisting them in advancing to self-sufficiency through employment. we provide free training and coaching services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Cincinnati Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Sober Living Inc Hart. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI — $65,600 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATICINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $63,500 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITALRIDE CINCINNATI — $33,500 · OtherRIDE CINCINNATISOBER LIVING INC HART — $29,300 · OtherSOBER LIVING INC HARTKINDERVELT 50CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S — $23,302 · OtherKINDERVELT 50CINCINNATI CHILDREN'SST JOSEPH ORPHANAGE — $18,000 · OtherST JOSEPH ORPHANAGEOASIS ELITE BOXING CLUB — $15,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED — $11,725 · OtherPARKINSON SUPPORT & WELLNESS OF CIN — $11,600 · OtherDEER PARK COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COR — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $3,000 · OtherSPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER — $73,600 · EducationSPRINGER SCHOOL AND CEN…Cincinnati Youth Collaborative — $38,000 · EducationCincinnati Youth Collab…BEEX FOUNDATION — $19,194 · EducationBEEX FOUNDATIONDOHN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL — $18,600 · EducationDOHN COMMUNITY HIGH SCH…SEAN LORING CLASSIC — $75,000 · HealthSEAN LORING CLASSI…The Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation — $27,300 · HealthThe Karen Wellingt…RIDE CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $12,500 · HealthRIDE CINCINNATI FO…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthLOVESOME STABLES INC — $44,000 · Human ServicesLOVESOME STABLE…IMPACTING TOMORROW INCORPORATED — $30,000 · Human ServicesIMPACTING TOMOR…BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY — $16,300 · Human ServicesBRIDGEWAY ACADE…THE NEW PATH INC — $6,600 · Human ServicesTHE NEW PATH IN…+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $70,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERS…
Other$284,527Education$149,394Health$115,800Human Services$97,400Philanthropy$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEAN LORING CLASSIC — $75,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetSPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER — $73,600 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI — $65,600 over 7y, 8.6% of budgetLOVESOME STABLES INC — $44,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative — $38,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetIMPACTING TOMORROW INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOBER LIVING INC HART — $29,300 over 7y, 59% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation — $27,300 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetDOHN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL — $18,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEWAY ACADEMY — $16,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED — $11,725 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW PATH INC — $6,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE THROWS FOR KIDS — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEAN LORING CLASSIC
  • Who funds SPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI
  • Who funds LOVESOME STABLES INC
  • Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative
  • Who funds IMPACTING TOMORROW INCORPORATED
  • Who funds SOBER LIVING INC HART
  • Who funds The Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation
  • Who funds BEEX FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DOHN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY
  • Who funds RIDE CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE NEW PATH INC
  • Who funds HAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC
  • Who funds FREE THROWS FOR KIDS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Tql Foundation Inc · Farmer Family Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Loring Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Loring Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Loring Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph