Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Link Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$375k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.4MInternational$1.0MHealth$981kHuman Services$360kFood & Nutrition$120kPublic Benefit$120kCivil Rights$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$375,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$375,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $95k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 21 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$3.5M
$876k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+632%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $270k · revenue +61%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $240k · revenue +48%
  • CF
    Center for Survivors of Torture
    6× · 2017–2022 · $210k · revenue +376%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
    one grant, 2023 · $836k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SHORT FICTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +632%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Citizens Commission On Human Rights of Austin

The citizens commission on human rights of austin (cchr of austin) is a non-political, non-religious mental health industry watchdog whose mission is to eradicate abuses committed under the guise of mental health. we work to ensure patient…

—
2
Citizens Commission On Human Rights

The citizens commission on human rights (cchr) is a non-profit, non-political, non-religious mental health industry watchdog whose mission is to eradicate abuses committed under the guise of mental health. we work to ensure patient and…

International
3
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
4
Center for Constitutional Rights

Ccr is a non-profit legal and educational organization dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the united states constitution the universal declaration of human rights. ccr stands with social justice movements…

Civil Rights
5
Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.

Science & Tech
6
Center for Justice & Accountability

The center for justice and accountability (cja) is an international human rights organization dedicated to deterring torture, war crimes, crimes against humanity and other severe human rights abuses around the world through litigation,…

Crime & Legal
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
9
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
10
Utah Health & Human Rights Project

The organization's mission is to help survivors of torture living in utah to heal from their physical and psychological injuries and rebuild their lives.

Health
11
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
12
Center for Justice and International Law

To contribute to the full enjoyment of human rights in the americas through effective use of the tools of the inter-american system and international human rights law

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Classical Guitar Alive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $836,495 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINCAPITOL BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION INC: $687,737 · OtherCAPITOL BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION INCMETROPOLITAN OPERA: $450,755 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERAIndividual grant recipient: $375,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED NATIONS CHILDRENS FUND: $200,000 · OtherUNITED NATIONS CHILDRENS FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $125,000 · OtherTHEATRE FOR THE NEW CITY: $125,000 · OtherPEERS: $120,000 · Other+6 more: $495,000 · Other+6 moreTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $270,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICT…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $239,653 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATION…Center for Survivors of Torture: $210,000 · InternationalCenter for Survivor…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $120,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH …HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesFUN4SENIORS: $95,000 · Recreation & SportsCLASSICAL GUITAR ALIVE: $75,000 · EducationMARCH OF DIMES INC: $75,000 · HealthCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN SHORT FICTION INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,414,987International$839,653Human Services$170,000Recreation & Sports$95,000Education$75,000Health$75,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Arts & Culture$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITOL BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION INC: $687,737 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $270,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $239,653 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Survivors of Torture: $210,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $170,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCLASSICAL GUITAR ALIVE: $75,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Child Guidance Center: $70,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITOL BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Survivors of Torture ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds FUN4SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICAL GUITAR ALIVE ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Child Guidance Center ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SHORT FICTION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Better Business BureauTX15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Better Business Bureau · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Link Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Link Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Link Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Link Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Link’s filings →

    More from the funding graph