Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Linda and Harvey Saligman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$512k
Granted FY2026still arriving
18
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.5MHealth$299kArts & Culture$275kPhilanthropy$209kYouth Development$62kCrime & Legal$50kFood & Nutrition$24kEnvironment$13kOther$0
02FY2026 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $123k
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LINDA & HARVEY SALIGMAN FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND$360,000
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$31,500
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$25,000
NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCATION$14,310
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$12,000
DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER$10,000
LITTLE FOLKS SCHOOL$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LOS ANGELES$10,000
NATIONAL SPEECH & DEBATE ASSOCIATION$10,000
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$9,450
IN TOWN PLAY GROUP$5,000
NANTUCKET ATHENEUM$5,000
ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET$2,500
NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION$2,250
Individual grant recipient$1,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET INC: $1k → 6%SMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET INC: $1k → 6%SMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET: $500 → 6%SMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET INC: $300 → 6%SMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET INC: $250 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
PA
CA
MO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 39 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2026, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
12

Total granted

$2.9M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+8%

Still filing today

64%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2019–2026 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2019–2026 · $88k · revenue +76%
  • NH
    NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2019–2026 · $73k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +8%
  • PA
    PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
2
Nassau County Museum of Art

The museum's mission is to encourage and promote the appreciation of fine art to people in its surrounding communities and beyond. the museum is dedicated to fostering a deeper understanding of the arts, with particular emphasis on the…

Arts & Culture
3
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
4
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
5
Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences dba the Staten Island Museum

Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…

Arts & Culture
6
Norwalk Seaport Association Inc

The norwalk seaport association, inc. offers a cultural, environmental, and historical journey to the norwalk islands. the sheffield island lighthouse and the light keeper's cottage provide a unique historical and educational venue which…

Arts & Culture
7
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
8
Naples Art Association Inc

Naples art institute is a place to discover, learn about, and engage with the art of our time. (continued on schedule o).as a cornerstone of naples' cultural landscape, we welcome artists, students, and visitors to explore the powerful…

Arts & Culture
9
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
10
Newport Art Museum and Art Association

The newport art museum's mission is to share a diversity of art and experiences that spark reflection, inspiration, and connection within our newport community and beyond. the museum was founded in 1912 on the belief that arts and culture…

Arts & Culture
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
American Numismatic Society

The mission of the american numismatic society is to promote and advance the study, research, and appreciation of numismatics.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nantucket Historical Association; the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,459,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY+3 more: $32,166 · EducationTHE LINDA & HARVEY SALIGMAN FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND: $539,000 · OtherTHE LINDA & HARVEY SALIGMAN FOUNDATION DO…NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $320,850 · OtherNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITALST LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW: $75,000 · OtherST LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAWBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LOS ANGELES: $45,000 · Other+25 more: $114,453 · Other+25 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $88,330 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLIT…NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $73,445 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET …NATIONAL FORENSIC LEAGUE D/B/A NATIONAL SPEECH AND DEBATE ASSOC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL F…The Society of the Four Arts Inc: $28,700 · Arts & CultureThe Societ…ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $12,750 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $33,123 · Arts & Culture+8 moreDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $31,000 · Science & TechUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $18,200 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $5,700 · EnvironmentALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $500 · Environment
Education$1,491,166Other$1,094,303Arts & Culture$286,348Science & Tech$31,000Philanthropy$28,200Youth Development$25,000Environment$6,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,459,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $88,330 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $73,445 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FORENSIC LEAGUE D/B/A NATIONAL SPEECH AND DEBATE ASSOC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $28,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINTOWN PLAYGROUP INC: $20,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $18,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $12,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $9,846 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $6,675 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $6,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $5,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $5,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $4,950 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET LIGHTSHIP BASKET MUSEUM INC: $3,748 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET INC: $3,050 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $2,320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $2,199 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ARTS COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN AND THE ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FORENSIC LEAGUE D/B/A NATIONAL SPEECH AND DEBATE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FOLKS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds INTOWN PLAYGROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET LIGHTSHIP BASKET MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SMALL FRIENDS ON NANTUCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Nantucket IncMA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · Clara Foundation Inc · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · The Hale Family Foundation · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Elizabeth Thayer & E Geoffrey Verney Foundation · The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · Gilbert Verney Foundation · Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · Boston Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Linda and Harvey Saligman Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Linda and Harvey Saligman Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Linda and Harvey Saligman Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Linda and Harvey Saligman Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Linda and Harvey Saligman’s filings →

More from the funding graph