Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lillian Kaiser Lewis Foundation Co Frost Bank

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of THE LILLIAN KAISER LEWIS FOUNDATION CO FROST BANK’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON$50,000
EVELYN RUBENSTEIN JEWISH COMMUNITY$39,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$16,000
SEARCH HOMELESS SERVICES$10,000
EMERGING GRACE MINISTRIES INC$9,000
AIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON$5,000
WOMEN ON THE WAY UP$4,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE OF GREATER HOUSTON$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $16k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $2k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $1k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $1k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$791k · 21 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$791k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+10%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +15%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +107%
  • IM
    Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston
    3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • GS
    GILBERT SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • ML
    MICKEY LELAND KIBBUTZIM INTERNSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CA
    CAREER AND RECOVERY SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

2
Fostering Family

Fostering family dba the riverside project is a 501(c)(3) public charity that on behalf of houston's children and their families, brings together organizations and passionate people working as one to help families heal and children thrive.

Community Improvement
3
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
4
Houston Area Women's Center

The Houston Area Women's Center (HAWC) works to end domestic and sexual violence and supports all in building safe and healthy lives through advocacy, counseling, education, shelter, and support services.

Human Services
5
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

6
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
7
Forgotten Angels Inc

To provide quality care to children and adults with developmental disabilities in a safe, loving home environment where they are treated with respect, compassion, and dignity and provided the means, support, and encouragement to reach…

Human Services
8
Coalition for the Homeless of Houston Harris County

The coalition for the homeless of houston/harris county acts as a catalyst, uniting partners and maximizing resources to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing with supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
9
Summerhouse Houston

Summerhouse Houston's supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their familites, and our community through employment, volunterism, and partnerships to foster a culture of belonging, choice and respect.

Human Services
10
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
11
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
12
Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emerging Grace Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%0%<5yr17%10%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr18%5%20–35yr8%52%35–55yr8%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%0%<5yr17%2%5–10yr21%1%10–20yr18%4%20–35yr8%55%35–55yr8%39%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
19%
3,802/20,419

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EVELYN RUBENSTEIN JEWISH COMMUNITY — $251,562 · OtherEVELYN RUBENSTEIN JEWISH COMMUNITYSEARCH HOMELESS SERVICES — $78,000 · OtherSEARCH HOMELESS SERVICESSHLENKER SCHOOL CONGREGATION BETH I — $67,000 · OtherSHLENKER SCHOOL CONGREGATION BETH IJewish Federation of Greater Houston — $50,200 · OtherJewish Federation of Greater HoustonThe Houston Food Bank — $30,000 · OtherInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston — $30,000 · Other+17 more — $100,300 · Other+17 moreHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON — $117,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEU…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $99,300 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY…COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston — $17,000 · PhilanthropyUndies for Everyone — $2,500 · PhilanthropyCamp For All Foundation — $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentEmerging Grace Ministries Inc — $9,000 · ReligionAIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC — $8,000 · HealthPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM HOUSTON INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$607,062Arts & Culture$117,500Human Services$105,300Philanthropy$19,500Youth Development$17,500Religion$9,000Health$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON — $117,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $99,300 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston — $50,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCamp For All Foundation — $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston — $17,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVITA LIVING INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUndies for Everyone — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM HOUSTON INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA SMALL MIRACLE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston
  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation
  • Who funds The Women's Resource of Greater Houston
  • Who funds Emerging Grace Ministries Inc
  • Who funds AIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS
  • Who funds VITA LIVING INC
  • Who funds Undies for Everyone
  • Who funds CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC
  • Who funds PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds A SMALL MIRACLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable FoundationTX19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · The Elkins Foundation · Strake Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Shirley and David Toomim Family Foundation · The Enrico & Sandra Di Portanova Charitable Foundation · The Brodsky Foundation · The Junior League of Houston Inc · Vivian L Smith Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lillian Kaiser Lewis Foundation Co Frost Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lillian Kaiser Lewis Foundation Co Frost Bank?

    Find your warmest path to The Lillian Kaiser Lewis Foundation Co Frost Bank through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph