Skip to content
The Liegl Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Liegl Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.8MHealth$3.0MHuman Services$149kScience & Tech$100kCrime & Legal$85kEnvironment$50kAnimals$50kEducation$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$11,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEACON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$1,000,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$100,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MICHIANA$15,000
ELKHART COUNTY CANCER RESOURCES$11,000
MICHIGAN SHORES CLUB FOUNDATION$10,000
ELKHART COUNTY JAIL MINISTRY$10,000
LIFELINE YOUTH MINISTRIES$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Elkhart County Community Foundation: $1.1M → 13%BEACON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1.0M → 13%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%Elkhart County Community Foundation: $800k → 13%Ronald McDonald House Charities of Indiana-Michiana Inc: $125k → 13%MICHIGAN SHORES CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%Elkhart County Community Foundation Inc: $700k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MICHIANA: $15k → 13%The Jail Ministry of Elkhart County: $75k → 13%Cultivate Food Rescue: $25k → 13%ELKHART COUNTY CANCER RESOURCES: $11k → 13%ELKHART COUNTY JAIL MINISTRY: $10k → 13%Wellfield Botanic Gardens Inc: $50k → 13%LIFELINE YOUTH MINISTRIES: $3k → 13%Elkhart Education Foundation: $25k → 13%The Humane Society of Elkhart County Incorporated: $50k → 13%Goshen Health Systems Inc: $2.0M → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elkhart General Hospital Inc

We deliver outstanding care, inspire health, and connect with heart.

Health
2
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Group

The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…

—
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc

Eskenazi Health Foundation inspires, energizes and promotes a vital, healthy Indianapolis community by providing strategic guidance and philanthropic resources to Eskenazi Health.

Health
5
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

—
6
Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
7
Ely Health and Hospital Foundation

To provide financial resources to support the mission of ebch in its commitment to care for and enhance the health and wellbeing of the community it serves.

Health
8
Dickinson County Healthcare System

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Goshen Health Foundation Inc

The mission of Goshen Health Foundation, Inc. is to inspire generosity, invite individuals and organizations to partner with Goshen Health to meet the needs of our community, and make the experience of giving transformational.

Health
11
Michigan Health Leadership Fund

To advance the well-being of michigan residents through the promotion of sound public policies and responsible legislation. the purpose of these activities is to promote policies that strengthen the michigan health care system.

—
12
Island Hospital Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds to support island health and its commitment to community health in and around anacortes, washington.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Indiana-Michiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $3,794,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INCGoshen Health System Inc: $2,000,000 · HealthGoshen Health System IncBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $1,000,000 · HealthBeacon Health Foundation IncRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF INDIANA-MICHIANA INC: $125,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherThe Jail Ministry of Elkhart County: $75,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MICHIANA: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $33,169 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $50,000 · AnimalsWELLFIELD BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentELKHART EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE MICHIGAN SHORES CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $25,000 · Employment
Philanthropy$3,794,000Health$3,000,000Other$348,169Animals$50,000Environment$50,000Education$35,000Employment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $3,794,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetGoshen Health System Inc: $2,000,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $1,000,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF INDIANA-MICHIANA INC: $125,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWELLFIELD BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetELKHART EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN SHORES CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rex and Alice A Marti…Welter Foundation IncRon and Lisa Fenech F…Bill Deputy FoundationCommunity Foundation …Everwise Foundation I…1st Source Bank Found…University of Notre D…Renaissance Charitabl…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…
Rex and Alice A Martin Foundation IncIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rex and Alice A Martin Foundation Inc · Welter Foundation Inc · Ron and Lisa Fenech Foundation · Bill Deputy Foundation · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Everwise Foundation Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Liegl Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Liegl Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Liegl Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home