Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Liebowitz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2021
23
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Liebowitz Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The New York Community Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Liebowitz Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $97k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
11
’18
13
’19
14
’20
15
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.9MHealth$203kReligion$72kInternational$21kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$15kAnimals$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2021 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k19 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$10,000
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$10,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$5,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC$4,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$4,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$3,000
HADASSAH$3,000
HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION$3,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$3,000
PORT WASHINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,000
NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION$3,000
PORT WASHINGTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF YAD LAKASHISH LIFELINE FOR THE OLD: $500 → 7%FRIENDS OF YAD LAKASHISH LIFELINE FOR THE OLD: $500 → 7%HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $3k → 6%HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $2k → 6%HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $2k → 6%HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $1k → 6%HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
VA
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 24 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$394k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+252%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $45k · revenue +39%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $17k · revenue +33%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $16k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • NI
    NATIONAL INVASIVE GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • WA
    WINTHROP ADULT ONCOLOGY & HEMATOLOGY INFUSION CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
3
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Community Trust; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $1,825,399 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST+2 more: $48,500 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $66,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UN…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $40,000 · OtherAMERICAN CA…WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $33,000 · OtherWORLD JEWIS…ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $22,020 · OtherALZHEIMER'S…CHABAD OF PORT WASHINGTON: $20,400 · OtherCHABAD OF P…+11 more: $40,115 · Other+11 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $13,000 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $11,000 · HealthST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · Health+1 more: $125 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $16,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · InternationalLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC: $14,500 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $14,000 · AnimalsHATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $9,036 · Human ServicesFriends of Yad LKashishLifeline for the Old: $1,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$1,873,899Other$221,535Health$70,625International$21,000Arts & Culture$15,000Animals$14,000Human Services$10,036

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $1,825,399 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $44,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION: $9,036 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY CHEST OF PORT WASHINGTON NY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGO WITH COURAGE INC: $125 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds LANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HATZILU RESCUE ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY CHEST OF PORT WASHINGTON NY INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Yad LKashishLifeline for the Old ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GO WITH COURAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jane & Martin Schwartz Family FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jane & Martin Schwartz Family Foundation · The Pamela and Laurence Tarica Foundation · The Brodsky Family Foundation · Peter & Jeri Dejana Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Liebowitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Liebowitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Liebowitz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph