· Private foundation
The Lewis M & Esther Perlstein Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - WILDLIFE RECOVERY FUND | $8,000 |
| TEMPLE SHALOM | $3,000 |
| TEMPLE EMUNAH | $3,000 |
| NATURE BRIDGE | $2,000 |
| PETA - PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS | $1,750 |
| INOVA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES | $1,750 |
| CONGREGATION OF AGUDAT ACHIM | $1,500 |
| BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE | $1,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $1,250 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $1,200 |
| APDA - AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF BORDERLAND | $1,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $800 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $750 |
| INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION | $700 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.
93 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CACONWAY AREA HUMANE SOCIETY2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +104%
- FOFriends of Borderland Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +486%
- TATHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- JUJDC UKRAINE RELIEF ACTIVITIESone grant, 2022 · $4k
SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INCone grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -60%- BFBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
How this is measured
109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONWAY AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Friends of Borderland Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
- Who funds THE CARROLL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds White Mountain Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC ↗
- Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE & FAITHFUL PET RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Charles & Esther Lee Kimerling Charitable Foundation · Fife Family Foundation Inc · Brady Foundation · Joseph and Rae Gann Charitable Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Lewis M & Esther Perlstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lewis M & Esther Perlstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Journey Home Inc: 59% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- Straight Ahead Ministries Inc: 27% of income from government
- Kingdom Trail Association Inc: 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
- Lasell University: 4% of income from government
- Friends of Sholan Farms Inc: 3% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Lewis M & Esther Perlstein Family’s filings →