Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Levy-Horowitz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$550k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$775kHuman Services$625kArts & Culture$315kEducation$250kEnvironment$165kHousing & Shelter$145kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$60,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK FOR NYC$300,000
BRONXWORKS$100,000
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE$60,000
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE$40,000
FILM FORUM$25,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRONXWORKS INC: $125k → 28%BRONXWORKS: $100k → 28%BRONXWORKS: $100k → 28%BRONXWORKS: $100k → 28%BRONXWORKS: $100k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $75k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $25k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 6 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+11%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $775k · revenue +248%
  • BRONXWORKS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $625k · revenue +80%
  • FF
    FILM FORUM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $315k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • TA
    THE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
Habitat for Humanity New York City and Westcherster County Inc

Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
3
Fifth Avenue Committee Inc

Fifth avenue committee's mission is to advance economic, social and racial justice in new york city through its comprehensive community development programs and projects.

—
4
Hot Bread Kitchen Ltd

Hot bread kitchen creates economic opportunity through culinary job skills training and placement, food entrepreneurship, and an ecosystem of support for individuals who face barriers to meaningful careers.

Human Services
5
Lantern Community Services Inc

Lantern community services' mission is to champion the independence and well-being of people who are impacted by or threatened with homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
7
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
8
Leap Inc

Leap empowers low and moderate income people by helping them gain access to living-wage employment opportunities and career paths. we seek to develop programs that counter prevailing market inequalities and contribute to a broader movement…

Housing & Shelter
9
Nazareth Housing Inc

See schedule oto promote housing stability and economic mobility among vulnerable families and individuals of new york city through the provision of homelessness prevention services, emergency family shelter, supportive housing, and urgent…

Housing & Shelter
10
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
11
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Film Forum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $775,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY+1 more: $25,000 · Community ImprovementBRONXWORKS INC: $625,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INCFILM FORUM INC: $315,463 · Arts & CultureFILM FORUM INCCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $120,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR …THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CON…NATURE CONSERVANCY: $65,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERV…SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $250,000 · EducationSARAH LAWREN…THE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC: $10,000 · Employment
Community Improvement$800,000Human Services$625,000Arts & Culture$315,463Other$285,000Education$250,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $775,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $625,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $315,463 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $250,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Levy-Horowitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Levy-Horowitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Levy-Horowitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph