Skip to content
The Levett Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Levett Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Animals$72kYouth Development$19kHealth$17kHuman Services$14kEducation$11kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,165
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAWHIDE RESCUE INC$12,165
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $1k → 26%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
IA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 16 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
24

Total granted

$123k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+8%

Still filing today

56%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O3
    OPERATION 300 INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $28k · revenue +485%
  • ER
    Equine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $17k · revenue +32%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • PL
    PENNY LANE DOG ADOPTION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • KS
    K9 STRONG INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • NM
    NICK MAGOS CANCER CALLOUT FND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
3
Pets for Patriots Inc

The organization's mission is to transform the lives of veterans by helping them save an at risk shelter dog or cat, and to end all animal homelessness in the us and enrich the lives of men and women who serve, and have served our country.…

Animals
4
K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

—
5
CAUSE4PAWS Pet Food Bank

Many seniors and veterans share their only meal of the day with their companion animals. we deliver pet food for these precious animals so they can remain at home or with their person and not have to be surrendered to shelters.

Animals
6
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
7
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
8
Troops First Foundation Incorporated

To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

Public Benefit
9
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
10
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
11
Foundation for Advancing Veterans' Health Research

To promote, administer, and conduct research and education at the va to improve the health and lives of veterans.

Health
12
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAWHIDE RESCUE INC: $32,165 · AnimalsRAWHIDE RESCUE INCEquine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc: $17,200 · AnimalsEquine Rescue and Adoption Foundation …K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,750 · Animals+1 more: $200 · AnimalsPENNY LANE DOG ADOPTION: $10,000 · OtherPENNY LANE DOG ADOPTIONK9 STRONG INC: $5,000 · OtherK9 STRONG INCNICK MAGOS CANCER CALLOUT FND: $5,000 · OtherNICK MAGOS CANCER CALLOUT FNDARC: $4,000 · OtherARCAMERICAS VETDOGS K-9 CORPS INC: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAS VETDOGS K-9 CORPS INCST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $3,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITALNJ STATE TROOPERS NCO FUND: $3,000 · OtherNJ STATE TROOPERS NCO FUNDWATCHUNG PBA - M MELCHIONDA FND: $2,100 · OtherGREEN BROOK FIRE AND EMS: $2,000 · OtherAIDS LIFECYCLE: $2,000 · Other+16 more: $6,645 · Other+16 moreOPERATION 300 INC: $27,600 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION 300 INCFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,000 · International+1 more: $200 · InternationalPaws With A Cause: $3,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC: $200 · Philanthropy
Animals$52,315Other$45,745Youth Development$27,600Education$11,000International$6,200Human Services$6,000Philanthropy$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAWHIDE RESCUE INC: $32,165 over 3y, 11% of budgetOPERATION 300 INC: $27,600 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetEquine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc: $17,200 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAWHIDE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION 300 INC ↗
  • Who funds Equine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Levett Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Levett Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Levett’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home