Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lester and Roberta Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$247kHealth$136kFood & Nutrition$125kHuman Services$119kArts & Culture$112kScience & Tech$60kYouth Development$51kHousing & Shelter$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN ARIZONA AIDS FOUNDATION$30,000
AZ CYBER INITIATIVE$25,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$20,000
TUCSON BADGER YOUTH WRESTLING CLUB$10,000
KXCI TUCSON COMMUNITY RADIO$10,000
BOOKS FOR CLASSROOMS$6,000
ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $15k → 15%ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $5k → 15%INTERMOUNTAIN CTRS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$641k · 12 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$641k
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+53%

Still filing today

42%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LITERACY CONNECTS
    4× · 2017–2023 · $100k · revenue +71%
  • Southern Arizona AIDS Foundation
    3× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +80%
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
    3× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • GV
    GREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $34k · revenue +254%
  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND A RESOURCE CENTER 27-3585869
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • GM
    GAP MINISTRIES FOR FOOD PACKAGING SYSTEM
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Goodwill Industries of Southern Az Inc

Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona works toward ensuring that all people have the opportunity to reach their potential and contribute to our community. Through quality, evidence-based, workforce development programs; Goodwill…

—
3
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
4
Tucson Values Teachers

To elevate the teaching profession in southern arizona by empowering and celebrating prek-12 teacher excellence through community engagement and investment.

Employment
5
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
6
Southern Az Childrens Advocacy Ctr Inc

The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…

Crime & Legal
7
Arizona Center for Afterschool Excellence Inc

The arizona center for afterschool excellence is dedicated to the enhancement of child and youth development and educational achievement through quality afterschool programming.

Education
8
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
9
Compass Training Center Az
Education
10
Ymca of Southern Arizona

Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…

Human Services
11
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
12
Genesis Program Inc

Genesis city's mission is to effect positive change in our community by empowering disadvantaged youth to acquire the education and work skills they need to become lifelong learners and productive members of their community in this and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literacy Connects; the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TUCSON YOUTH MUSIC CENTER 86-6051375: $76,595 · OtherTUCSON YOUTH MUSIC CENTER 86-6051375ALTAR VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherALTAR VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOLTUCSON VILLAGE FARM: $63,200 · OtherTUCSON VILLAGE FARMHIGHER GROUND: $33,250 · OtherHIGHER GROUNDSAN MIGUEL HIGH SCHOOL: $32,700 · OtherSAN MIGUEL HIGH SCHOOLTUCSON BADGER YOUTH WRESTLING CLUB: $25,000 · OtherHIGHER GROUND A RESOURCE CENTER 27-3585869: $22,500 · OtherGAP MINISTRIES FOR FOOD PACKAGING SYSTEM: $22,208 · OtherJOHN VALENZUELA YOUTH CENTER: $21,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $21,000 · Other+12 more: $115,080 · Other+12 moreLITERACY CONNECTS: $100,000 · EducationLITERACY CONNECTSSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $55,000 · EducationSouthern AZ Researc…Books for Classrooms: $6,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $90,000 · HealthSouthern Ariz…EPIDAURUS DBA AMITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthEPIDAURUS DBA…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $55,000 · Human ServicesINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $5,000 · Human ServicesGREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $33,696 · Food & NutritionGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentAZ CYBER INITIATIVE INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$507,533Education$166,000Health$110,000Human Services$70,000Food & Nutrition$33,696Youth Development$30,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $100,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $55,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $33,696 over 1y, 17% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEPIDAURUS DBA AMITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTUCSON YOUTH MUSIC CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetStep Up To Justice: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $6,480 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBooks for Classrooms: $6,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds Southern Arizona AIDS Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds Southern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds AZ CYBER INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds EPIDAURUS DBA AMITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON YOUTH MUSIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Step Up To Justice ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc ↗
  • Who funds Books for Classrooms ↗
  • Who funds IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ36.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · Marshall Foundation · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona · The Stocker Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Southwest Foundation for Education & Historical Preservation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lester and Roberta Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lester and Roberta Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lester and Roberta Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lester and Roberta Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lester and Roberta Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph