Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Lehrer Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$453k
Granted FY2019
37
Grants FY2019
35
Organizations funded FY2019
14%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$210,000
Organizations funded a year
29 to 35
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
5
Total assets, FY2019
$132k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 14% of the organizations The Lehrer Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201935$431k14%
FY201833$290k24%
FY201729$182kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Arts & Culture$452kHealth$89kInternational$83kReligion$80kAnimals$58kPhilanthropy$55kHuman Services$55kHousing & Shelter$29kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Music Academy of the West$315,35032%
Direct Relief$60,00030%
Congregation Bnai Brith$40,1253n/a
Santa Barbara Hillel$40,00022%
Santa Barbara Symphony Orchestra Association$23,0003n/a
Transition House$15,00030%
Opera Santa Barbara$15,00030%
Surgical Eye Expeditions International Inc$12,00030%
State Street Ballet$12,00030%
Environmental Defense Center$9,00030%
Show all 23 grantees

Plus 19 recipients with no EIN on record ($307k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Lehrer Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMusic Academy of the West: $315,350 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetDirect Relief: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Hillel: $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTransition House: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOpera Santa Barbara: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSurgical Eye Expeditions International Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetState Street Ballet: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEnvironmental Defense Center: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGirls Incorporated of Greater Santa Barbara: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSeva Foundation: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPath: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEsalen Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNbcc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetShelterbox USA Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Boys and Girls Clubs of Santa Barbara County: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Coast Jr Golf Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Precision Museum Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Retina Research Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Turpin-Allebrand Family Charitable Foundation · Walter J & Holly O Thomson Charitable · Schlinger Chrisman Foundation Northern Trust Company Trustee · Roy and Ida Eagle Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Stone Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Lehrer Family Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lehrer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lehrer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Lehrer Family Foundation

How much does The Lehrer Family Foundation give?
The Lehrer Family Foundation reported 37 grants totaling $452,625 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 29 and 35 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Lehrer Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (47%), Health (9%), International (9%).
Who are The Lehrer Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Music Academy of the West ($315k), Direct Relief ($60k), Congregation Bnai Brith ($40k).
Does The Lehrer Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Lehrer Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Lehrer Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Santa Barbara Foundation, Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation, The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation.
Where is The Lehrer Family Foundation based?
The Lehrer Family Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lehrer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph