Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lefkofsky Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.1M
Granted FY2023
76
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$13MEducation$4.7MHealth$4.0MPhilanthropy$2.0MCivil Rights$1.8MRecreation & Sports$1.4MInternational$831kYouth Development$632kOther$0
02FY2023 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 76 grants below total $5,055,902, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,113,731 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,057,829 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k25 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $515k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.7M
$10,300
Median grant
—
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Steppenwolf Theatre Company$1,050,000
Jewish United Fund$500,000
University of Wisconsin Foundation$333,334
American Brain Tumor Association$333,334
Anti-Defamation League$250,000
Gateway for Cancer Research$250,000
Northwestern University$200,000
Friends of Israel Defence Forces$175,000
Art Institute of Chicago$175,000
Peer Health Exchange$166,667
Friends of Israel Defence Forces$166,667
Museum of Contemporary Art$135,000
Lake Forest Academy$125,000
Ylabs$100,000
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Young Women United: $20k → 14%Chicago Architectural Biennial: $10k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE: $750 → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%Leap Innovations: $10k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 99 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

99 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2023, 62 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

99
171

Total granted

$24M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+36%

Still filing today

24%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    2× · 2018–2019 · $500k · revenue +34%
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $400k · revenue +33%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
    2× · 2018–2019 · $332k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • MP
    MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $900k · revenue +340%
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $353k · revenue +195%
  • KC
    Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
4
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education; the most unlike its peers is Dynami Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 305 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/93
Grantees still filing
64/93
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Steppenwolf Theatre Company: $4,415,000 · OtherSteppenwolf Theatre CompanyUniversity of Michigan: $1,726,666 · OtherUniversity of MichiganArt Institute of Chicago: $1,275,000 · OtherArt Institute of ChicagoJewish United Fund: $950,000 · Other+151 more: $13,810,448 · Other+151 moreSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $4,331,138 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $331,509 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPOR…Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $300,000 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin M…WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $216,667 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $323,000 · Arts & Culture+11 moreMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $900,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $400,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $225,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $178,917 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $167,560 · EducationKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION: $80,000 · EducationCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $50,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College: $50,000 · EducationErikson Institute: $50,000 · Education+3 more: $87,500 · EducationJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $500,000 · PhilanthropyPitch In: $55,000 · PhilanthropyThe Chicago Community Trust: $20,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $125,000 · HealthCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $100,000 · HealthMEN4CHOICE EDUCATION: $75,000 · HealthSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $37,400 · HealthForward Together: $30,000 · HealthRepro TLC: $25,000 · HealthGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $25,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $20,000 · Health+2 more: $25,000 · HealthWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO CARES INC: $60,000 · Community Improvement
Other$22,177,114Arts & Culture$5,502,314Recreation & Sports$1,300,000Education$1,088,977Philanthropy$595,000Health$462,400Community Improvement$160,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $4,331,138 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwestern University: $400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $331,509 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $300,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $225,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $216,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $178,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $167,560 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $107,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION: $80,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMEN4CHOICE EDUCATION: $75,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPitch In: $55,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErikson Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $37,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForward Together: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $28,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Innovation Foundation Inc: $27,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRepro TLC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR MIDDLE LEVEL EDUCATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc: $20,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC EDUCATION SUPPORT FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCHICAGO MEDIA PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $20,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSundance Institute: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL24.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Irving Harris Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Gates Foundation · Best Portion Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lefkofsky Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lefkofsky Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lefkofsky Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lefkofsky Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 305 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $6.6M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lefkofsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph