· Private foundation
The Lebel Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| MISSAUKEE HUMANE SOCIETY | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,371 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,151 |
| RUFF RUCK CHALLENGE | $2,085 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION | $2,000 |
| PLEASANT HEARTS PET FOOD PANTRY | $2,000 |
| PET TALES RESCUE BOARD | $2,000 |
| BESTPALS ANIMAL RESCUE | $2,000 |
| SHELTER ANIMAL | $2,000 |
| WEST MICHIGAN WILDLIFE CENTER | $2,000 |
| COMMUNITY CAT CREW | $2,000 |
| POUND BUDDIES | $1,996 |
| GRAND RAPIDS PIT BULL ALLIANCE | $1,937 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA2× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +103%
- WMWEST MICHIGAN WILDLIFE CENTER2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +45%
- BABESTPALS ANIMAL RESCUE CENTER2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $2k
- PIPAY IT FORWARD ANIMAL OUTREACHone grant, 2021 · $2k
- LCL C RESCUEgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
provide shelter and care for dogs and cats
To help rescue unwanted pets
rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need
Animal Rescue
Cat rescue spay/ nueter
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Animal rescue
Rescue and adoption of animals
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
Rescue animals
The paws of muskingum county mission is to achieve a smaller, healthier pet population through affordable spay/neuter program
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paws Rescue and the most unlike its peers is Prostate Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF MUSKEGON COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ↗
- Who funds Cannonsville Critters ↗
- Who funds MISSAUKEE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PAWS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds BESTPALS ANIMAL RESCUE CENTER ↗
- Who funds L C RESCUE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CAT CREW CO ↗
- Who funds NOAH PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Two Seven Oh Inc · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lebel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.