Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lawrence and Carol Pollock Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$54kHuman Services$32kArts & Culture$32kHealth$29kEducation$20kPublic Benefit$19kPhilanthropy$11kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$355k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVODAH THE JEWISH SVC CORPS$5,000
AMICA CENTER$3,500
PUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN$2,500
ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TEAM RED WHITE AND BLUE$2,000
CONGREGATION OR AMI$2,000
KLEIN LIFE$1,500
HARP FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $5k → 15%PUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $3k → 15%SILVER SPRING MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $3k → 7%PUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $3k → 15%Silver Spring Martin Luther School: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRING MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $2k → 7%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE PUEBLO: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 15 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$208k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+28%

Still filing today

33%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsSocial ScienceEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +44%
  • PC
    PUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN
    3× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +107%
  • PI
    PHMC Integrated
    4× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • MM
    MISSION MSAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • DH
    DAP Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +325%
  • U
    USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
2
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
3
Pueblo Community Health Center Inc

To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.

—
4
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
5
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
6
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
Philadelphia Post-Acute Partners Llc

We create world class, patient-centered rehabilitation and post acute care services by defining evidence-based practice and fully-integrating care throughout the continuum.

Health
8
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
9
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
Presbyterian Medical Services Foundation Inc

The foundation's purpose is to conduct activities and operate in a manner designed or intended to facilitate and support in all respects the programs of presbyterian medical services. the foundation was organized to receive, hold, invest,…

Philanthropy
11
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
12
Gallup Community Health

Gallup community health's mission is to provide excellent and accessible medical care to our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dap Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVODAH THE JEWISH SVC CORPS: $34,000 · OtherAVODAH THE JEWISH SVC CORPSMCCALLUM THEATRE: $25,000 · OtherMCCALLUM THEATREIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $18,500 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONCONGREGATION OR AMI: $18,200 · OtherCONGREGATION OR AMIFRIENDS OF THE P S ANIMAL SHELTER: $11,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE P S ANIMAL SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $6,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherABRAMSON SENIOR CARE: $5,500 · Other+11 more: $20,400 · Other+11 morePUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $10,500 · Human ServicesGemma Services: $5,800 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $17,500 · Public BenefitRAYMOND AND MIRIAM KLEIN JCC (D/B/A KLEINLIFE): $16,300 · Recreation & SportsPHMC Integrated: $9,200 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 · EducationGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMISSION MSA: $5,000 · HealthDAP Health Inc: $2,500 · HealthUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $2,500 · Health
Other$164,400Human Services$18,800Public Benefit$17,500Recreation & Sports$16,300Education$14,200Philanthropy$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRAYMOND AND MIRIAM KLEIN JCC (D/B/A KLEINLIFE): $16,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $10,500 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHMC Integrated: $9,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGemma Services: $5,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION MSA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAP Health Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN VALUES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON MONTHLY INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHARP FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPueblo Rescue Mission: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND AND MIRIAM KLEIN JCC (D/B/A KLEINLIFE) ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHMC Integrated ↗
  • Who funds Gemma Services ↗
  • Who funds MISSION MSA ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN VALUES ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON MONTHLY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pueblo Rescue Mission ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southern Colorado Community FoundatCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southern Colorado Community Foundat · El Pomar Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lawrence and Carol Pollock Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lawrence and Carol Pollock Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lawrence and Carol Pollock Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph