· Private foundation
The Langerman Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $420k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALL STARS PROJECT INC | $220,000 |
| FACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY | $50,000 |
| JOSEPH SLIFKA CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE | $50,000 |
| NEW JERSEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $37,500 |
| UNCHAINED AT LAST | $3,500 |
| CHARITABLE PHARMACY | $3,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $3,500 |
| COLUMBUS METRO LIBRARY FDN | $3,500 |
| THE ADVOCATES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN ROMANIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST AVALANCHE CENTER | $3,000 |
| WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASALL STARS PROJECT INC6× · 2019–2024 · $945k · revenue +59%
- CFCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc2× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +26%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC7× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- JFJEWISH FED OF GREATER METROWEST NJone grant, 2022 · $165k
- JSJOSEPH SLIFKA JEWISH LIFE AT YALEone grant, 2021 · $50k
- RFRIDE FOR WORLD HEALTHone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…
International food policy research institute's (ifpri) vision is a world free of hunger and malnutrition. ifpri's mission is to provide research-based policy solutions that sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is Trey Athletes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds FACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH SLIFKA CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST AVALANCHE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNCHAINED AT LAST INC ↗
- Who funds TREY ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATEONE ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Langerman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Langerman Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Langerman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.