Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kyser Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$174kHuman Services$76kEducation$65kCivil Rights$17kHealth$9kScience & Tech$8kPublic Benefit$1kEnvironment$650
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$641k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF THE TRIANGLE$10,000
COMPASS CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES$10,000
UNC-TV$5,000
CAROLINA PERFORMING ARTS$3,000
FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY AT UNC - CHAPEL HILL$3,000
UNC - CH$3,000
UNC - CHAPEL HILL DEPARTMENT OF ROMANCE LANGUAGES (ITALIAN)$3,000
EMPOWERMENT INC$2,000
THE CHELSEA ART THEATRE INC$1,000
ACKLAND ART MUSEUM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
EL FUTURO$500
WCPE RADIO$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EMPOWERMENT INC: $5k → 13%EMPOWERMENT INC: $4k → 13%EMPOWERMENT INC: $2k → 13%EMPOWERMENT INC: $2k → 13%EMPOWERMENT INC: $750 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Kyser Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Kyser Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$346k · 23 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
6

Total granted

$346k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-7%

Still filing today

39%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +6%
  • The Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +353%
  • NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • CAROLINA ABORTION FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -7%
  • J6
    JANUARY 6 PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -23% · 30% of their budget
  • CH
    CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO NAACP
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Music Raleigh Inc

To enrich and connect individuals in the greater raleigh community through intimate and exceptional chamber music experiences. we are committed to presenting world class artists performing music of the highest caliber, providing…

Arts & Culture
2
The Charlotte Center for the Humanities Inc

The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.

Human Services
3
The Durham Museum

Provide relevant educational and entertaining opportunities within the region that exceed customer expectations, while preserving our community's vibrant cultural history.

Arts & Culture
4
The Charleston Museum

To educate Charleston area residents and visitors about the natural and cultural history of the South Carolina Lowcountry through collections, exhibitions, preservation, conservation, research and related programming.

Arts & Culture
5
The Little Theatre of Charlotte Inc dba Theatre Charlotte

To produce volunteer-based theatrical events in the Charlotte, NC region.

Arts & Culture
6
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
7
Carolina Theatre of Durham Inc

The Carolina Theatre welcomes everyone. We enrich the experience of audiences through programming that drives the cultural, educational, and economic vitality of the region.

Arts & Culture
8
North Carolina Equal Access to Justice Foundation Inc

In collaboration with the legal community, NCEAJF empowers North Carolinians to navigate the civil justice system.

Crime & Legal
9
Museum of the New South Inc

Levine Museum's mission is to connect the past to the future to realize the promises of a New South through exhibits that explore complex chapters in the region's history and programs that launch dialogue, foster empathy, and build an…

Arts & Culture
10
Carteret County General Hospital Foundation

To assist carteret general hospital in providing the best possible healthcare to the people of carteret county through fund raising programs that support community based programs, purchase of vital equipment, capital expansion, renovations…

Philanthropy
11
Carolina Immigration Law

Provides immigration legal services to persons who are otherwise financially incapable of obtaining such services.

Crime & Legal
12
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Madeira School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $62,500 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INCThe Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle — $41,500 · OtherThe Chamber Orchestra of the TriangleCAROLINA PERFORMING ARTS — $34,000 · OtherCAROLINA PERFORMING ARTSUNC - CHAPEL HILL DEPARTMENT OF ROMANCE LANGUAGES (ITALIAN) — $32,000 · OtherUNC - CHAPEL HILL DEPARTMENT OF ROMANCE LANGUAGES (ITALIAN)UNC - CH CAROLINA COVENANT — $25,000 · OtherUNC - CH CAROLINA COVENANTFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY AT UNC - CHAPEL HILL — $24,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY AT UNC - CHAPEL HILLUNC-TV — $19,000 · OtherUNC-TVSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE - VOTING RIGHTS — $16,000 · OtherACKLAND ART MUSEUM — $12,500 · Other+11 more — $37,000 · Other+11 moreNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $17,000 · Arts & CultureCHELSEA ART THEATER INC — $2,750 · Arts & CultureSTRATFORD HALL — $1,000 · Arts & CultureEMPOWERMENT INC — $13,250 · Human ServicesEL FUTURO INC — $8,250 · HealthCAROLINA ABORTION FUND — $1,000 · HealthThe Madeira School — $1,500 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $1,000 · EducationVINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INC — $400 · Environment
Other$303,500Arts & Culture$20,750Human Services$13,250Health$9,250Education$2,500Environment$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $62,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetThe Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle — $41,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWERMENT INC — $13,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEL FUTURO INC — $8,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHELSEA ART THEATER INC — $2,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Madeira School — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA ABORTION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANUARY 6 PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATFORD HALL — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INC — $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds The Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EMPOWERMENT INC
  • Who funds EL FUTURO INC
  • Who funds CHELSEA ART THEATER INC
  • Who funds The Madeira School
  • Who funds CAROLINA ABORTION FUND
  • Who funds JANUARY 6 PROJECT
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
  • Who funds STRATFORD HALL
  • Who funds VINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kyser Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph