Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kyle Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$192k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.1MArts & Culture$250kYouth Development$70kPhilanthropy$30kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM AND PLANETARIUM$100,000
THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY$50,000
OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME$30,000
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY$10,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,030
OSU FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ARTSOK: $10k → 15%THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY: $50k → 16%Oklahoma State University Foundatio: $1.7M → 19%TULSA AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM AND PLANETARIUM: $100k → 15%Oklahoma Hall of Fame: $45k → 16%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $45k → 19%Boys Girls Club: $20k → 15%OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $30k → 16%Oklahoma State University Foundatio: $35k → 19%Tulsa Air Space Museum: $20k → 15%Oklahoma Hall of Fame: $15k → 16%Oklahoma State University Foundatio: $5k → 19%TULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $10k → 15%Oklahoma Hall of Fame: $15k → 16%Oklahoma State University Foundatio: $5k → 19%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 15%OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $15k → 16%OSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%Tulsa Area United Way: $20k → 15%John Marshall High School Foundatio: $50k → 16%ALZHEIMER FDN: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $252k → 16%University of Central Oklahoma: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 4 repeat orgs$537k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$387k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+90%

Still filing today

75%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME
    5× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +35%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $46k · revenue +12%
  • TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $252k · revenue +10%
  • JM
    John Marshall High School Foundatio
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • UO
    University of Central Oklahoma
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

3
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
4
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
7
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
8
Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce Inc

The voice of business and the visionary organization in the greater oklahoma city region.

9
Oklahoma Repertory Theatre Group Inc

Okc rep produces live theater that builds community, creates conversation, and inspires us all.

Arts & Culture
10
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
11
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
12
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Oklahoma State University Foundatio — $1,739,128 · OtherOklahoma State University FoundatioTULSA AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM AND PLANETARIUM — $100,000 · Other+7 more — $146,030 · Other+7 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION — $251,512 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…Oklahoma State University Foundation — $46,000 · EducationOklahoma Stat…OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $120,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,985,158Education$297,512Arts & Culture$140,000Youth Development$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION — $251,512 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $120,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $46,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetARTSOK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kyle Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph