Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Krumme Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$100kArts & Culture$80kYouth Development$66kCommunity Improvement$30kEducation$23kReligion$12kRecreation & Sports$10kEnvironment$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRISTOW SOCIAL SERVICES$25,000
BRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
BRISTOW COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
STAND IN THE GAP MINISTRIES$10,000
REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
RIVER PARKS FOUNDATION$10,000
BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
PROJECT SANTA$1,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$1,000
BRISTOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BRISTOW SOCIAL SERVICES: $50k → 15%RIVER PARKS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $45k → 15%PROJECT SANTA: $1k → 15%BRISTOW SOCIAL SERVICES: $25k → 15%UP WITH TREES: $9k → 15%BRISTOW SOCIAL SERVICES: $25k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%BRISTOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1k → 15%BRISTOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$300k · 7 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$300k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+56%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Bristow Social Services Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • BH
    BRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +41%
  • BE
    BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $21k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • UW
    UP WITH TREES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +56%
  • TC
    Tulsa Coalition of 100 Black Men Association
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
2
Tulsa Police Foundation Inc

Raise awareness and funds for needs of the Tulsa Police Department that will benefit officers and citizens in the city of Tulsa. A joint effort between law enforcement and the citizens of Tulsa to enhance the safety and security of each.

Crime & Legal
3
River Parks Authority

To develop, preserve and maintain public park lands and facilities along the arkansas river in tulsa county that is known as river parks.

Recreation & Sports
4
Foundation for Tulsas Future

Support the tulsa regional chamber of commerce in lessening the burdens of the municipal government of the city of tulsa as the city endeavors to improve economic growth in tulsa metro area

Community Improvement
5
Tulsa Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc

Provides community service by assisting the needy, aging and youth as well as encouraging international understanding and community improvement.

6
Tulsa Jewish Retirement Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to support the needs of jewish seniors in tulsa and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
7
Tulsa Historical Society

The mission of tulsa historical society & museum is to illuminate the past, enrich the present, and inspire future generations by collecting, preserving, and presenting tulsa's history.

Arts & Culture
8
Tulsa Town Hall Endowment Inc

Financial support of Town Hall of Tulsa Corporation

Community Improvement
9
Town Hall of Tulsa Corp

To provide a dynamic speaker series in order to open minds, stir curiosities, and inspire imaginations.

Community Improvement
10
Kipp Tulsa Academy College Prep Inc

Kipp tulsa prepares students from educationally under-served neighborhoods in tulsa, ok with the academic, character and life skills necessary for success in college and the competitive world beyond.

Education
11
Tulsa Oktoberfest Inc

To promote German and European culture through festivals.

Arts & Culture
12
Tulsa County Medical Society Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is River Parks Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tulsa Coalition of 100 Black Men Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Bristow Social Services Inc — $100,000 · OtherBristow Social Services IncBRISTOW COMMUNITY CENTER — $30,000 · OtherBRISTOW COMMUNITY CENTERUP WITH TREES INC — $9,000 · OtherUP WITH TREES INC+2 more — $2,500 · OtherBRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $80,000 · Arts & CultureBRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY …THE REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE REED COMMUNITY FOU…BRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $21,000 · PhilanthropyBRISTOW ED…RIVER PARKS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER PARK…STAND IN THE GAP INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTulsa Coalition of 100 Black Men Association — $5,000 · Crime & LegalWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Education
Other$141,500Arts & Culture$80,000Youth Development$65,000Philanthropy$31,000Human Services$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBristow Social Services Inc — $100,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetBRISTOW HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $80,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetTHE REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetBRISTOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetRIVER PARKS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTulsa Coalition of 100 Black Men Association — $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Krumme Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 100%
  • Up With Trees Inc100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph