Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kotel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$128kHealth$120kReligion$118kArts & Culture$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$15kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$66k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$5,000
SPECIAL GIFTS THEATER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLEARBROOK CENTER: $1k → 14%CLEARBROOK CENTER: $550 → 14%CLEARBROOK CENTER: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 60% of The Kotel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 20%.

The Kotel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$426k · 14 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$426k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+32%

Still filing today

36%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +117%
  • SG
    SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +20%
  • C
    CLEARBROOK
    3× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • SC
    SYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CNTR
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pinky Swear Foundation

To provide financial support to families with children battling cancer.

Human Services
2
Special Olympics Entertainment Corporation

To support, perform services for, and at all-times operate exclusively for the benefit of special olympics, inc.

Recreation & Sports
3
Celebrate the Spectrum

To raise awareness for those with autism syndrome disorder (asd) by providing assistance, resources, support, and education to children with autism syndrome disorder (asd) and their families.

Human Services
4
Savannah's Playground Inc

Creating social interaction for children with all abilities through enabling playgrounds and programs designed to meet their special needs.

Public Benefit
5
A Special Wish Foundation Inc

To grant the wishes of seriously / terminally ill children.

—
6
Gio's Garden Inc

Gio's garden's mission as a non-profit organization is to nurture and strengthen families with children with special needs (birth through 6 years) by increasing their access to needed services.

Human Services
7
The Izzy Foundation

The izzy foundation is a national non-profit located in providence rhode island whose mission is to design, fund and izspire cretive projects and programs for families whose children have cancer or other life altering medical conditions to…

Human Services
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute

To fund cystic fibrosis research, provide educational and personal support, and to spread awareness of cystic fibrosis, a life-threatening genetic disease.

Health
10
Reform It Now Inc

Autism Citizen provides education about autism for attorneys, gov, & business. It advocates for the rights of autistic individuals when seeking professionals trained to understand this growing population. It provides free information to…

—
11
Pinkball Inc

PINKBALL is an organization founded by "baseball moms" who were moved to create a fund for screening and diagnostic mammograms and breast ultrasounds for women in our community who are uninsured or under insured who may not qualify for…

Health
12
The Pink Agenda Inc

The purpose of the Pink Agenda Inc is to raise awareness and funds for breast cancer research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pandas Pans Advocacy and Support. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $96,000 · OtherST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCHST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $30,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITALCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $24,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESST JUDE CHILDRESN HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRESN HOSPITALMR DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherMR DAVID'S FOUNDATIONNOTRE DAME CATHOLIC CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherSYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CNTR: $10,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH: $9,510 · Other+11 more: $19,630 · Other+11 moreFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $127,814 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INCGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $54,910 · HealthGIGI'S PLAYH…SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN: $45,300 · Arts & CultureSPECIAL GI…SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $10,100 · Recreation & SportsFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$236,140International$127,814Health$54,910Arts & Culture$45,300Recreation & Sports$10,100Youth Development$5,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $127,814 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $54,910 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN: $45,300 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $10,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANDAS PANS ADVOCACY AND SUPPORT: $2,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANDAS PANS ADVOCACY AND SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kotel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kotel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kotel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kotel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kotel’s filings →

More from the funding graph