How much did THE KOEHLER FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of THE KOEHLER FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

childrenmountaincancer

2023

—

2024

paws

2025

paws

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k12 grants · $11k
$10k–50k1 grant · $25k

$750

Median grant

States reached

$212k

Total assets

Largest grants

HOLY REDEEMER CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
MARY'S HOME$2,100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,000
IMPACT100 MARTIN$1,100
CARING FIELDS FELINES$800
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$750
PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS$500
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION$500
COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC$300
PAWS OF HONOR$250
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$250
ELEV8 HOPE$200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$97k · 7 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$97k

$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%

+46%

Still filing today

71%

41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionSocial SciencePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ER
EQUINE RESCUE AND ADOPTION FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +50%
CF
CARING FIELDS FELINES
2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +149%
PF
PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS
2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +80%

Funded once

MC
MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $37k · revenue +43%
BG
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES
one grant, 2022 · $20k
MH
MAMAS HOUSE
one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services

Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals

Canines for Service Inc

CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.

Human Services

Crisis Response Canines

Crisis Response Canines' mission is to provide strength comfort and emotional support to individuals families communities and first responders experiencing intense traumatic emotions in the aftermath of critical incidents.

Public Safety & Disaster

Carolina Basset Hound Rescue Inc

The mission of Carolina Basset Hound Rescue is to rescue, rehabilitate and rehome unwanted basset hounds in North Carolina and South Carolina.

Animals

Canine Rehabilitation Center and Cat Sanctuary

CRCCS is an animal shelter and behavior education center. Our mission is to inspire, educate, and motivate the human spirit, while saving, nurturing, and loving the canine and feline spirit, bringing the two together to change the way the…

Animals

Operation Paws for Homes Inc

To create a better world for companion animals and the community through rescue, rehabilitation, education, spay and neuter programs and resources to underserved populations.

Animals

Mile High Canine Rescue Inc

To reduce the number of abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs in shelters within Colorado, Texas, and New Mexico by providing loving foster homes and medical care, facilitating adoptions, and funding low cost spay and neuter services.

Animals

K9KASTLE Corp

Rescue, rehabilitation and re-homing (adoption) of at-risk dogs & cats.

Animals

Companion Bridge Inc

Companion Bridge is an online community for those with animals that require significant medical care to have a central place to inform family and friends and to solicit help.

Human Services

Canine Helpers for the Handicapped Inc

To unite deserving people with highly trained, disability specific dogs in order to achieve a high degree of independence for the clients.

—

East Coast Canine Rescue Inc

Rescue homeless canines from crowded shelters, as well as situations of abuse and neglect and rehabilitate and rehome them with the help of animal advocates, veterinarians, shelters and rehabilitation centers.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paws of Honor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

15/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$176,900Philanthropy$37,260Human Services$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Animals$9,250Social Science$2,100Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy FundNY9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE KOEHLER FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOUNTAIN MEALS ON WHEELS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 201383648 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MOUNTAIN MEALS ON WHEELS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Koehler Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Koehler Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE KOEHLER FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Koehler Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE KOEHLER FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Koehler Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph