Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Klungness Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.5M
Granted FY2023
93
Grants FY2023
24
States reached
$521k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.

Environment$3.6MEducation$1.1MHealth$863kAnimals$744kCivil Rights$375kHuman Services$359kInternational$245kArts & Culture$200kOther$0
02FY2023 · 93 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k10 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
$30,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SCIENCES FO$521,000
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST$350,450
MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$300,000
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC$250,000
WILDERNESS WATCH INC$220,950
THE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC$180,000
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY$172,500
U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$150,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$150,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$150,000
NEW POWER TOUR INC$150,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$115,000
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST$103,050
KEWEENAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC: $100k → 13%CARING HOUSE INC: $50k → 13%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND INC: $3k → 6%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4k → 17%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC: $50k → 13%CARING HOUSE INC: $4k → 13%CARING HOUSE INC: $4k → 13%CARING HOUSE INC: $3k → 13%CARING HOUSE INC: $3k → 13%CARING HOUSE INC: $3k → 13%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $30k → 11%LITTLE BROTHERS-FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $1k → 14%OMEGA HOUSE INC: $30k → 14%BARBARA KETTLE GUNDLACH SHELTER HOME FOR ABUSED WO: $50k → 14%OMEGA HOUSE INC: $3k → 14%BARBARA KETTLE GUNDLACH SHELTER HOME FOR ABUSED WO: $4k → 14%BARBARA KETTLE GUNDLACH SHELTER HOME FOR ABUSED WO: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of The Klungness Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Klungness Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 59 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
14

Total granted

$5.5M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

86%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST
    4× · 2020–2023 · $497k · revenue +44% · 63% of their budget
  • WW
    WILDERNESS WATCH INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $432k · revenue +34% · 26% of their budget
  • NP
    NEW POWER TOUR INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $225k · revenue +140% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • AH
    ALMOST HOME ANIMAL SHELTER AND ADOPTION CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +23%
  • CF
    CITIZENS FOR HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
4
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
5
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
9
NatureServe

NatureServe's mission is to leverage the power of science, data, and technology to guide biodiversity conservation and stewardship. We activate our mission by working with a network of 60+ partners located in states and provinces across…

Environment
10
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
11
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
12
Endangered Species International

Endangered Species International is strongly committed to reversing the trend of human-induced species extinction, saving endangered animals, and preserving wild places.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mercy Ems Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYmca Youth DevelopmentFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Food Banks and PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Food PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Immigrant Worker SupportLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …Christian Youth CampsDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/100
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/95
Grantees still filing
65/95
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SCIENCES FO — $521,000 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SCIENCES…MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · OtherMICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $351,326 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC — $180,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $375,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC+42 more — $1,461,539 · Other+42 moreWILDERNESS WATCH INC — $431,950 · EnvironmentWILDERNESS WATCH INCNEW POWER TOUR INC — $225,000 · EnvironmentNEW POWER TOUR INCPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC — $207,300 · EnvironmentPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR E…North American Wilderness Recovery — $74,000 · EnvironmentKEWEENAW LAND TRUST INC — $73,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $72,500 · EnvironmentECOLOGICAL OPTIONS NETWORK — $67,500 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $66,000 · EnvironmentSWAN VIEW COALITION INC — $64,400 · EnvironmentGRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INC — $59,500 · Environment+9 more — $253,000 · Environment+9 moreALBION COLLEGE — $400,000 · EducationALBION COL…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $220,000 · EducationUC SAN DIE…Electromagnetic Safety Alliance Inc — $50,000 · EducationElectromag…University of Arizona Foundation — $45,000 · EducationUniversity…CELLULAR PHONE TASK FORCE INC — $31,500 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationCOPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $155,000 · HealthCOPPER SHO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $145,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $121,000 · HealthTHE MICHAE…SCIENTIFIC ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION — $103,050 · HealthSCIENTIFIC…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $84,500 · HealthPLANNED PA…MAYO CLINIC — $75,000 · HealthMAYO CLINI…+4 more — $55,000 · Health+4 moreENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST — $496,500 · PhilanthropyENVIRONMEN…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $125,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES …KEWEENAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $108,000 · PhilanthropyKEWEENAW C…REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $140,000 · AnimalsCOPPER COUNTRY HUMANE SOCIETY — $58,000 · AnimalsFriends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter — $52,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $50,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society — $50,000 · AnimalsFriends of Pima Animal Care Center — $47,500 · AnimalsDICKINSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $42,800 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife — $40,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER — $30,000 · AnimalsCOLORADO HORSE RESCUE — $20,000 · Animals+4 more — $43,300 · AnimalsNORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesCARING HOUSE INC — $67,600 · Human ServicesBARBARA KETTLE GUNDLACH SHELTER HOME FOR ABUSED WOMEN INC — $58,000 · Human ServicesOMEGA HOUSE INC — $33,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human Services+3 more — $8,000 · Human Services
Other$3,388,865Environment$1,594,150Education$751,500Health$738,550Philanthropy$729,500Animals$573,600Human Services$391,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST — $496,500 over 4y, 63% of budgetWILDERNESS WATCH INC — $431,950 over 5y, 26% of budgetALBION COLLEGE — $400,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $375,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $351,326 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW POWER TOUR INC — $225,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $220,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC — $207,300 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC — $180,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCOPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $155,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC — $150,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $145,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $140,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $121,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEWEENAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $108,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSCIENTIFIC ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION — $103,050 over 2y, 61% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $84,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOPPER HARBOR TRAILS SOCIETY INC — $83,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $80,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth American Wilderness Recovery — $74,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetHANCOCK TRAILS CLUB — $73,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetKEWEENAW LAND TRUST INC — $73,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $72,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $70,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFINLANDIA UNIVERSITY — $68,289 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCARING HOUSE INC — $67,600 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetECOLOGICAL OPTIONS NETWORK — $67,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP — $67,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $66,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSWAN VIEW COALITION INC — $64,400 over 5y, 43% of budgetSUPERIOR BIO-CONSERVANCY INC — $60,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetGRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INC — $59,500 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetCOPPER COUNTRY HUMANE SOCIETY — $58,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetBARBARA KETTLE GUNDLACH SHELTER HOME FOR ABUSED WOMEN INC — $58,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetMenominee Range Historical Foundation — $55,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetPINE MOUNTAIN MUSIC FESTIVAL — $54,500 over 4y, 31% of budgetFriends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter — $52,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElectromagnetic Safety Alliance Inc — $50,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC — $49,500 over 3y, 30% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center — $47,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Copper Shores Communi…James a Ruppe Foundat…Keweenaw Community Fo…Community Foundation …Resources Legacy FundThe Martin Family Fou…Maine Community Found…The Joyce and Warren …Dickinson Area Commun…Baxter International …Superior Health Found…Incrediblebank Founda…
Copper Shores Community Health FoundationMI40.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Copper Shores Community Health Foundation · James a Ruppe Foundation · Keweenaw Community Foundation · Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula · Resources Legacy Fund · The Martin Family Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Joyce and Warren Brule Foundation · Dickinson Area Community Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Superior Health Foundation · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Klungness Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Lomakatsi Restoration Project — 100% of income from government
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines