Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kittredge Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202026.

Recreation & Sports$350kEducation$198kFood & Nutrition$65kInternational$25kHuman Services$20kHealth$18kEnvironment$10kReligion$2k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP WAUBANOG INC$100,000
EVERY CHILD'S JOURNEY FOUNDATION INC$20,000
CLEAN MIAMI BEACH INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $25k → 12%BEMENT SCHOOL: $30k → 14%GIVE2ASIA: $25k → 10%KING'S ACADEMY: $5k → 17%REAL LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $2k → 10%CLEAN MIAMI BEACH INC: $10k → 15%CAMP WAUBANONG INC: $250k → 11%THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $20k → 12%BEMENT SCHOOL: $30k → 14%EVERY CHILD'S JOURNEY FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 15%CAMP WAUBANOG INC: $100k → 11%THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $20k → 12%BEMENT SCHOOL: $20k → 14%COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL: $13k → 12%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $13k → 14%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $13k → 14%GREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $13k → 14%BAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $13k → 14%GREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $13k → 14%GREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $13k → 14%GREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BEMENT SCHOOL: $10k → 14%GREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BEMENT SCHOOL: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$608k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$608k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+38%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BEMENT SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +52%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +74%
  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • BF
    BAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +38%
  • KA
    KING'S ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Greenfield School

Operation of an independent, nonsectarian, co-educational college preparatory school serving students in preschool through grade twelve.

3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
5
Derby Academy Trustees

Derby academy is a coeducational, pre-kindergarten through grade 8 school that nurtures the development of the child by providing opportunities for the maximum intellectual, emotional, and physical growth of each student.

Education
6
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
7
Morristown-Beard School

Morristown beard school is an educational college preparatory school in grades 6 to 12 located in morristown, new jersey.

Education
8
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
9
The Branson School

To provide an academically exceptional education to students grade 9 through 12 in a warm, supportive, and nurturing environment.

Education
10
West Nottingham Academy

To inspire and educate students to become socially aware leaders and innovators who positively impact their communities around the world

Education
11
Gilman School Incorporated

Gilman school is a diverse community dedicated to educating boys in mind, body and spirit through particular emphasis upon academic excellence, athletic participation and aesthetic appreciation. gilman seeks to produce men of character and…

Education
12
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Deerfield Academy and the most unlike its peers is Clean Miami Beach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMP WAUBANONG INC — $350,000 · OtherCAMP WAUBANONG INCTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $65,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCEVERY CHILDS JOURNEY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Other+2 more — $14,500 · OtherTHE BEMENT SCHOOL INC — $100,000 · EducationTHE BEMENT SCHOOL INCTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY — $75,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY+1 more — $5,000 · EducationGIVE2ASIA — $25,000 · InternationalGREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $18,000 · PhilanthropyCLEAN MIAMI BEACH INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentBAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER — $5,000 · Health
Other$449,500Education$180,000International$25,000Philanthropy$18,000Environment$10,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BEMENT SCHOOL INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY — $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENFIELD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKING'S ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kittredge Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Baystate Franklin Medical Center1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kittredge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kittredge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph