Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kirchner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$155kEducation$119kReligion$43kHousing & Shelter$42kArts & Culture$40kFood & Nutrition$34kHuman Services$29kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$249k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$10,000
WA ELKS CHARITIABLE TRUST$10,000
PEACEHEALTH ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER$9,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF COWLITZ COUNTY$7,500
ST ROSE CHURCH$7,500
ST ROSE SCHOOL$5,500
SETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREP$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$2,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF SEATTLE$2,500
EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOWER COLUMBIA$2,000
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE ADVOCACY CENTER$1,500
SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON WIND SYMPHONY$1,500
CABARET FOLLIES OF LOWER COLUMBIA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $8k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $4k → 13%EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $3k → 13%YOUTH & FAMILY LINK: $3k → 13%FISH OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $3k → 13%YOUTH & FAMILY LINK: $3k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $3k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $3k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $3k → 13%EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $3k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $3k → 13%FISH OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $3k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $3k → 13%YOUTH & FAMILY LINK: $3k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $3k → 13%EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $3k → 13%FISH OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $3k → 13%FISH OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $3k → 13%FISH OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $1k → 13%FISH OF COWLITZ COUNTY: $1k → 13%COMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$489k · 30 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
7

Total granted

$489k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+82%

Still filing today

47%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +27%
  • LC
    LOWER COLUMBIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +144%
  • CT
    COLUMBIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • PU
    PROJECT UPLIFT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • LC
    LOWER COLUMBIA CAP
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • SP
    SEATTLE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia Community Care

The mission of Columbia Community Care is to create authentic connections and community partnerships. We listen, and respond by providing resources and programs, while respecting the inherent dignity of every person.

Human Services
2
Columbia Falls Food Bank

Provide food to local needy

Food & Nutrition
3
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Roots Collaborative

A non-profit developer of permanent, affordable, tiny homes for the unsettled residents of Clark County, Washington.

Housing & Shelter
5
Coopersville Cares

Assist low income families

Human Services
6
Pathways to Housing

Provide case management and housing to homeless persons

Human Services
7
Community Lunch On Capitol Hill

Community lunch on capitol hill provides hot nutritious meals, clothing and other critical services to those enduring homelessness and economic hardship. our meals are open to all in a welcoming and inclusive environment.

Food & Nutrition
8
Columbia Gorge Helping Hands

To collect and distribute food and related items to families and individuals

Food & Nutrition
9
Columbia Gorge Casa

To be an advocate for children and families

Crime & Legal
10
Cowlitz-Wahkiakum County Legal Aid Program Inc

Cowlitz Wahkiakum Legal Aid seeks to assure justice for low income people in the civil courts. We provide access to legal help for people whose livelihood, family and wellness are threatened.

Crime & Legal
11
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
12
Cowlitz Chaplaincy

Religion/Charity/Education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridge Meadows; the most unlike its peers is Project Uplift. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $71,500 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERST ROSE SCHOOL: $44,500 · OtherST ROSE SCHOOLST ROSE CHURCH: $36,500 · OtherST ROSE CHURCHPEACEHEALTH ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER: $21,500 · OtherPEACEHEALTH ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTERST JOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $21,000 · OtherST JOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONPEACEHEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherPEACEHEALTH FOUNDATIONSETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREP: $19,000 · OtherSETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOWER COLUMBIA: $12,300 · Other+18 more: $67,250 · Other+18 moreSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES: $18,500 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANC…FISH of Cowlitz County: $12,000 · Human ServicesFISH of Cow…EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY S…Family Promise of Cowlitz County: $7,500 · Human ServicesFamily Prom…Youth and Family Link: $7,500 · Human ServicesYouth and F…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesLOWER COLUMBIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $52,500 · EducationLOWER COLUM…COLUMBIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $33,750 · Arts & CulturePLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCASCADE MEDICAL TEAM: $10,000 · HealthCommunity Health Partners: $5,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $3,500 · HealthLOWER COLUMBIA SCHOOL GARDENS: $13,500 · Environment
Other$328,550Human Services$54,000Education$52,500Arts & Culture$33,750Housing & Shelter$25,000Health$19,000Environment$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $71,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER COLUMBIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCOLUMBIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $33,750 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES: $18,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetLOWER COLUMBIA SCHOOL GARDENS: $13,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOWER COLUMBIA: $12,300 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetFISH of Cowlitz County: $12,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCASCADE MEDICAL TEAM: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetEMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYouth and Family Link: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Health Partners: $5,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $3,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBRIDGE MEADOWS: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOWER COLUMBIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LOWER COLUMBIA SCHOOL GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOWER COLUMBIA ↗
  • Who funds FISH of Cowlitz County ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE MEDICAL TEAM ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY SUPPORT SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise of Cowlitz County ↗
  • Who funds Youth and Family Link ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Partners ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE MEADOWS ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John M McClelland Sr Charitable FoundationWA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John M McClelland Sr Charitable Foundation · The Health Care Foundation · The Honorable Frank L & Arlene G Price Foundation · The Firstenburg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way of Cowlitz County · Evans-Kelly Family Foundation · Evans Venture Foundation · Nippon Dynawave Foundation · The Wollenberg Foundation · PeaceHealth · Central National Gottesman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kirchner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kirchner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 36%
  • Bridge Meadows: 36% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kirchner Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kirchner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kirchner’s filings →

More from the funding graph