Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Kim and David Wagman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
23
Grants FY2025
21
Organizations funded FY2024
14%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$960,000
Organizations funded a year
20 to 25
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$26M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations The Kim and David Wagman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving22$1.4M18%
FY202421$675k14%
FY202322$643k14%
FY202220$1.1M5%
FY202125$864k16%
FY202021$904k10%
FY201920$655kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$5.0MHealth$504kRecreation & Sports$341kHuman Services$283kFood & Nutrition$132kAnimals$10kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 31 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.0M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Kim and David Wagman Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 29 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSkidmore College: $3,060,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRye Country Day School: $525,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAmherst College Trustees: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Junior Tennis League Inc: $225,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPort Chester Carver Center Inc: $145,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $130,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding Westchester Inc: $115,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHarlem Junior Tennis and Education Program Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetOpen Door Foundation Inc: $90,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBlythedale Children's Hospital: $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRye Free Reading Room: $70,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGreenwich Hospital: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Rye New York: $60,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Windward School: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Karen Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Sharing Shelf Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGuidance Center of Westchester Inc: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLet's Get Ready Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGrand Street Settlement Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMy Money Workshop Inc: $12,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSteer for Student Athletes Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRerun Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHispanic Resource Center of Larchmont/Mamaroneck Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJohnny Mac Tennis Project Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHelping Hands for the Homeless and Hungry Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetBackyard Sports Cares Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe Fred Gabler Helping Hand Camp Fund Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetHackley School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudent Advocacy Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 29.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY21.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation Inc · Soros Fund Charitable Foundation · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · National Philanthropic Trust · Impact100 Westchester Inc · The Glickenhaus Foundation · American Express Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Kim and David Wagman Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kim and David Wagman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kim and David Wagman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Kim and David Wagman Foundation

How much does The Kim and David Wagman Foundation give?
The Kim and David Wagman Foundation reported 23 grants totaling $1,436,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 20 and 25 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does The Kim and David Wagman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (79%), Health (8%), Recreation & Sports (5%).
Who are The Kim and David Wagman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Skidmore College ($3.1M), Rye Country Day School ($525k), Amherst College Trustees ($350k).
Does The Kim and David Wagman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Kim and David Wagman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Kim and David Wagman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, The New York Community Trust, The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Kim and David Wagman Foundation based?
The Kim and David Wagman Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kim and David Wagman’s filings →

More from the funding graph