Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kiefer Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Religion$51kEducation$26kHealth$4kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$3kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$1kAnimals$250Other$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST BARNABAS AND ST SUSANN COPTIC CH$30,203
THE GREEN MOUNT SCHOOL$25,000
MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED$750
WILLIAM BAER SCHOOL$600
SACRED HEARTS PARISH$600
LUTHERAN MISSION SOCIETY$500
MARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$500
Individual grant recipient$250
COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER$250
FOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUB$250
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$250
WESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION$250
CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $250 → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $2k → 14%NETWORK FOR GOODBELLA'S TAIL WAG: $250 → 14%CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%KARS4KIDS: $3k → 11%WESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION: $750 → 6%LUTHERAN MISSION SOCIETY: $2k → 6%UNI MD SHORE MED CNTR AT EASTON: $170 → 10%COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 11%ST BARNABAS AND ST SUSANN COPTIC CH: $30k → 19%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $2k → 14%CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%WESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 6%LUTHERAN MISSION SOCIETY: $500 → 6%COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER: $998 → 11%THE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURC: $14k → 19%SACRED HEARTS PARISH: $600 → 11%MARTINI LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 19%SACRED HEARTS PARISH: $500 → 11%BALTIMORE FLAMINGOS RFC: $100 → 19%COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER: $250 → 11%THE GREEN MOUNT SCHOOL: $25k → 19%REISTERTOWN VOL FD: $250 → 11%WILLIAM BAER SCHOOL: $1k → 19%REISTERTOWN VOL FD: $250 → 11%WILLIAM BAER SCHOOL: $600 → 19%REISTERTOWN VOL FD: $250 → 11%THE OPTIMISTS CLUB ROM: $200 → 11%MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED: $1k → 11%MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED: $1k → 11%MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED: $750 → 11%FOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUB: $250 → 11%MARYLAND PUBLIC TV: $120 → 11%MARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $500 → 11%MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Kiefer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Kiefer Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 9 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$19k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+18%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
PhilanthropyEducationHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +53%
  • CA
    CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +129%
  • TW
    The William S Baer School
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURC
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • K4
    KARS 4 KIDS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -16%
  • ML
    MARTINI LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
2
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
4
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
7
Nourish Now Foundation Inc

To solve 2 major social issues simultaneously: food waste & hunger. nourish now is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit food bank, specialized in food recovery and providing donations from grocers, caterers, restaurants, bakeries, and other food donors…

Food & Nutrition
8
Cardinal Mccloskey Community Charter School

The mission of cardinal mccloskey community charter school is to address the academic, social-emotional and developmental needs of its students in a safe, supportive and trauma-sensitive learning environment. the school is committed to…

Education
9
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
10
The Maryland School for the Blind

As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…

Education
11
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
12
Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kars 4 Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST BARNABAS AND ST SUSANN COPTIC CH: $30,203 · OtherST BARNABAS AND ST SUSANN COPTIC CHTHE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INCTHE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURC: $13,734 · OtherTHE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCMISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED: $2,750 · Other+14 more: $9,799 · Other+14 moreKARS 4 KIDS INC: $2,575 · PhilanthropyThe William S Baer School: $1,600 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 · HealthCELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $2,750 · Arts & CultureWESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $250 · Education
Other$81,486Philanthropy$4,175Health$4,000Arts & Culture$2,750Housing & Shelter$1,000Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKARS 4 KIDS INC: $2,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $2,307 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetThe William S Baer School: $1,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KARS 4 KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The William S Baer School ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kiefer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kiefer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Kars 4 Kids Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kiefer’s filings →

More from the funding graph