Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kennenth and Joan Gosliner Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$225kEducation$171kHuman Services$144kArts & Culture$45kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$14kCivil Rights$11kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vivalon$12,000
Sandy Hook Promise$10,000
Marin Health Foundation$6,000
Reproductive Health for All$5,000
Jewish Family and Childrens Service$5,000
Beyond Differences$5,000
Shifting Gears USA$5,000
Congregation Rodef Sholom$4,000
US Holocaust Museum$3,500
LEUKEMIA SOCIETY$3,000
St San Pedro Rd Coalition$2,750
Anti-Defamation League$2,000
Simon Wiesenthal Center$2,000
By the Bay Health$1,000
San Joaquin Family Promise$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jewish Family and Childrens Service: $5k → 10%Jewish Family and Childrens Service: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS' SERVICES: $5k → 10%Jewish Family and Childrens Service: $5k → 10%Jewish Family and Childrens Service: $5k → 10%Jewish Family and Childrens Service: $4k → 10%Jewish Family and Childrens Service: $3k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS' SERVICES: $3k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS' SERVICES: $500 → 10%Hospice by the Bay: $2k → 8%By the Bay Health: $1k → 8%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $1k → 8%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $1k → 8%By the Bay Health: $1k → 8%Vivalon: $55k → 8%Vivalon: $12k → 8%Vivalon: $9k → 8%Whistlestop: $8k → 8%Vivalon: $5k → 8%Whistlestop: $3k → 8%Casa De Angeles Fndn: $500 → 8%RITTER HOUSE: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
CT
CA
DC
HI
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$593k · 24 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
32

Total granted

$593k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+48%

Still filing today

46%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalHealthPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    Vivalon
    6× · 2019–2024 · $91k · revenue +50%
  • SG
    SHIFTING GEARS USA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +27%
  • MG
    MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $13k · revenue +171%

Funded once

  • MH
    Marin History Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -83%
  • CF
    CITIZENS FOR ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • 1F
    1199 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
4
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
5
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
7
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
8
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Sonoma Botanical Garden
11
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
12
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services and the most unlike its peers is Casa de Angeles Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesChristian Missionary Organi…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersEducation Equity LeadershipJewish Community FederationsFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%5%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr14%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr18%6%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr14%63%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
12%
3,377/28,119

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Congregation Rodef Sholom — $217,700 · OtherCongregation Rodef SholomBeyond Differences — $71,100 · OtherBeyond DifferencesMarin Co Office of Education — $50,000 · OtherMarin Co Office of EducationTranscendance Theater — $17,000 · Other+44 more — $106,800 · Other+44 moreVivalon — $90,800 · Human ServicesVivalonJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $35,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHI…BY THE BAY HEALTH — $6,000 · Human Services+2 more — $750 · Human ServicesSHIFTING GEARS USA — $35,000 · Education10000 DEGREES — $5,500 · EducationMarin Theatre Company — $12,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $7,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $13,000 · HealthSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $500 · Crime & LegalHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $4,000 · Public Benefit
Other$462,600Human Services$132,550Education$40,500Arts & Culture$25,000Health$13,000Crime & Legal$10,500Public Benefit$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVivalon — $90,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBeyond Differences — $71,100 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSHIFTING GEARS USA — $35,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $12,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarin Theatre Company — $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget10000 DEGREES — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMarin History Museum — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasa de Angeles Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Childrens Fairyland Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRITTER CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vivalon
  • Who funds Beyond Differences
  • Who funds SHIFTING GEARS USA
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES
  • Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Marin Theatre Company
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES
  • Who funds Marin History Museum
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA24.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Charles & Barbara Goodman Foundation · Cerity Partners Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Harbor Point Charitable Foundation · The Fred Gellert Family Foundation · Koret Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kennenth and Joan Gosliner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kennenth and Joan Gosliner Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kennenth and Joan Gosliner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph