Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ken and Jean Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.1MPhilanthropy$1.1MEducation$272kHealth$184kReligion$56kEnvironment$52kHuman Services$17kSocial Science$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$699k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$20,000
ST ELIZABETH ANN SEATON$3,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
OR
CA
UT
CO
MO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 20 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
17

Total granted

$2.8M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+72%

Still filing today

65%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JEFFREY D CAMPBELL FAMILY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +44% · 100% of their budget
  • CH
    Craig Hospital Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +228%
  • UO
    University of the Pacific
    6× · 2017–2024 · $132k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARTHUR A DUGONI SCHOOL OF DENTI
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • AA
    ARTHUR A DUGONI SCH OF DENTISTRY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BC
    BOULDER COMM ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
7
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
12
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Pacific; the most unlike its peers is Hcu Education Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TODD DENICE CAMPBELL FOUNDATION: $1,041,308 · OtherTHE TODD DENICE CAMPBELL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $93,790 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+20 more: $205,978 · Other+20 moreTHE JEFFREY D CAMPBELL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,057,931 · PhilanthropyTHE JEFFREY D CAMPBELL FAMILY FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,544 · PhilanthropyCraig Hospital Foundation: $140,080 · HealthHCU EDUCATION SERVICES: $51,500 · HealthWHOLE SYSTEMS HEALTHCARE: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $794 · HealthUniversity of the Pacific: $131,986 · EducationCornell University: $17,517 · EducationEARTHJUSTICE: $36,600 · EnvironmentSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $10,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER: $17,000 · Civil RightsUNION RESCUE MISSION: $250 · Human Services
Other$1,341,076Philanthropy$1,059,475Health$212,374Education$149,503Environment$51,600Arts & Culture$30,000Civil Rights$17,000Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEFFREY D CAMPBELL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,057,931 over 2y, 100% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $140,080 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $131,986 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHCU EDUCATION SERVICES: $51,500 over 3y, 94% of budgetTHETA XI FOUNDATION: $43,856 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $36,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOLD TOWNE PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $21,197 over 2y, 81% of budgetCornell University: $17,517 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER: $17,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBuild Futures: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTriumph Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $794 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $544 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEFFREY D CAMPBELL FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds HCU EDUCATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THETA XI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD TOWNE PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WHOLE SYSTEMS HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds MOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Build Futures ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds K-9 Friendly Visitors ↗
  • Who funds Triumph Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ken and Jean Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ken and Jean Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Whole Systems Healthcare: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ken and Jean Campbell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ken and Jean Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ken and Jean Campbell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph