Skip to content

· Private foundation

The KeanHartquist Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.4MHuman Services$750kReligion$730kRecreation & Sports$200kHousing & Shelter$120kHealth$80k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$45,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Belmont Abbey College$50,000
YMCA of Stanly County$50,000
Hillsdale College$45,000
Ronald McDonald House of Chapel Hill$30,000
St Luke Catholic Church of Mint Hill$20,000
Wingate University$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 8% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%LASALLE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 22%CHILDRENS INN: $50k → 7%HILLSDALE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $50k → 9%ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 10%Duke University Medical Center: $50k → 11%Belmont Abbey College: $50k → 12%YMCA OF STANLY COUNTY: $200k → 13%UNC-CHAPEL HILL: $100k → 13%LASALLE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 22%CHILDRENS INN: $50k → 7%HILLSDALE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $50k → 9%ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 10%Ronald McDonald House of Chapel Hill: $50k → 11%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $50k → 12%YMCA OF STANLY COUNTY: $150k → 13%UNC-CHAPEL HILL: $50k → 13%LASALLE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 22%HILLSDALE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%St Luke Catholic Church of Mint Hill: $50k → 10%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $50k → 12%YMCA OF STANLY COUNTY: $150k → 13%LASALLE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 22%HILLSDALE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 10%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $50k → 12%YMCA of Stanly County: $100k → 13%LASALLE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 22%HILLSDALE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 10%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $50k → 12%YMCA OF STANLY COUNTY: $100k → 13%Hillsdale College: $50k → 14%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 10%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $50k → 12%YMCA OF STANLY COUNTY: $100k → 13%Wingate University: $50k → 7%ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 10%Belmont Abbey College: $50k → 12%YMCA of Stanly County: $50k → 13%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 14 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$4.1M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+21%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $600k · revenue +51%
  • BA
    BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +84%
  • WU
    WINGATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $385k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • DU
    Duke University Medical Center
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TE
    THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +21%
  • OL
    Our Lady of Annunciation Catholic Church
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ronald Mcdonald House of Chapel Hill Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA OF STANLY COUNTY: $850,000 · OtherYMCA OF STANLY COUNTYST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $350,000 · OtherST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCHHILLSDALE UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · OtherHILLSDALE UNIVERSITYOUR LADY OF ANNUNCIATION CH: $300,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF ANNUNCIATION CHUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $120,000 · OtherCHILDRENS INN: $100,000 · Other+5 more: $235,000 · Other+5 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $600,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC: $400,000 · EducationBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INCWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $385,000 · EducationWINGATE UNIVERSITYLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $285,000 · EducationLA SALLE UNIVERSITYHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $95,000 · Education+1 more: $40,000 · Education
Other$2,480,000Education$1,805,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $600,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC: $400,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $385,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $285,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $95,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CHAPEL HILL INC: $80,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetPFEIFFER UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CHAPEL HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The KeanHartquist Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The KeanHartquist Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The KeanHartquist Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The KeanHartquist Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on KeanHartquist’s filings →

    More from the funding graph