Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kavanaugh Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$103kInternational$99kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$11kEducation$7kCrime & Legal$1kHousing & Shelter$500Arts & Culture$250
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,060
Median grant
2
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMBODIA CHILDREN'S FUND$5,060
RURAL EDUCATION OF CAMBODIA INC$3,484
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Drew Lewis Foundation: $500 → 15%RURAL EDUCATION OF CAMBODIA INC: $62k → 7%RURAL EDUCATION OF CAMBODIA INC: $37k → 7%RURAL EDUCATION OF CAMBODIA INC: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
NV
NJ
CA
CO
MO
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Kavanaugh Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Kavanaugh Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 41% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 11 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$229k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+180%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rural Education of Cambodia Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $103k · 43% of their budget
  • WA
    WORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $74k · revenue -97%
  • CC
    Cambodian Childrens Fund
    4× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CA
    Charity Anywhere
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • YW
    YANG WARD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • TL
    THE LAW FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +180%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation

Asian university for women (auw) seeks to offer high quality education to young women of extraordinary talents drawn from diverse national, ethnic, religious, and socio-economic backgrounds. see schedule o for continuation.it is open to…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
4
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
5
The Parents' Campaign Research and Education Fund

The parents' campaign research & education fund coaches parents and community leaders in advocating effectively for public schools and provides objective research and analysis of public education policies and legislation to state leaders,…

Education
6
Root Change Inc

Root change's mission is to bring people together to question assumptions, think deeply, test ideas, and lead the way to a world built on social justice principles.

Employment
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
10
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
11
The Center for Khmer Studies Inc

The center for khmer studies promotes research, teaching, and public service in the social sciences, arts, and humanities in cambodia and the mekong region, fostering a deeper understanding of this vital part of the world.

Arts & Culture
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cambodian Childrens Fund; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Rural Education of Cambodia Inc: $102,781 · Human ServicesThe Rural Education of Cambodia Inc+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC: $73,775 · InternationalWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INCWheelchair Foundation: $15,669 · OtherWheelchair Found…Charity Anywhere: $7,500 · OtherCharity AnywhereUMKC PHARMACY FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherUMKC PHARMACY FO…Yangmali Ward Foundation: $3,150 · OtherYangmali Ward Fo…UMKC SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Other+7 more: $3,705 · Other+7 moreCambodian Childrens Fund: $23,911 · PhilanthropyCambodian C…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $1,600 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $2,000 · Education
Human Services$103,281International$73,775Other$35,024Philanthropy$23,911Health$2,250Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rural Education of Cambodia Inc: $102,781 over 3y, 43% of budgetWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC: $73,775 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund: $23,911 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAW FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Rural Education of Cambodia Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Cambodian Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAW FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kavanaugh Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kavanaugh Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kavanaugh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph