Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kathrine M & James H Milam Family Charities Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$23kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$4kEducation$3kInternational$2kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$144k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE STEWPOT ALLIANCE OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF DALLAS$2,213
LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS$1,984
ST ELIJAH ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
WEST MARKET STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$515
ACLU$250
ST PAUL'S ON THE PLAINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$250
KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION INC$225
PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT$208
RANDOLPH COLLEGE$150
SAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$124
THE SENIOR SOURCE$100
GRACE & HOLY TRINITY CATHEDRAL$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $1k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $200 → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1k → 14%THE HUMAN IMPACT: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 13 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
52

Total granted

$35k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+22%

Still filing today

46%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • RAZOM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -65%
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS'
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • JC
    JLD CENTENNIAL ENDOWMENT FDN
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc

Uwmd is a community-based social change organization that unites the community to create lasting change. for 100 years, we've brought together passionate change-makers, alongside corporate, civic and nonprofit partners, to strengthen…

Philanthropy
4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
5
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
6
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Fort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More

See Schedule OFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels provides comprehensive services, including Meals on Wheels, congregate meals, transportation, case management, health screenings, information and referral services, recreation, and more. Our…

Human Services
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
10
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
11
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
12
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is To Be Like Me; the most unlike its peers is Lubbock Heritage Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC: $10,230 · OtherLA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INCTHE STEWPOT ALLIANCE OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF DALLAS: $4,632 · OtherTHE STEWPOT ALLIANCE OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF DALLASNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $4,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK+49 more: $19,146 · Other+49 moreDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSO…+1 more: $257 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTO BE LIKE ME: $500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $250 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN IMPACT: $200 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $200 · Human ServicesTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $1,529 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $300 · EducationEDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES INC: $250 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationRAZOM INC: $1,648 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $155 · InternationalMARATHON KIDS INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentMERCY STREET: $267 · Youth DevelopmentLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $250 · HealthVHL ALLIANCE INC: $250 · HealthPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $208 · HealthGRACE TO GROW: $50 · Health
Other$38,008Arts & Culture$10,257Human Services$3,150Education$3,129International$1,803Youth Development$767Health$758

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC: $10,230 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $1,648 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $1,529 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARATHON KIDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTO BE LIKE ME: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY STREET: $267 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET LUBBOCK: $257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEREMOS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVHL ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBread For The World Inc: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMAN IMPACT: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE TO GROW: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGDALEN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗
  • Who funds MARATHON KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TO BE LIKE ME ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY STREET ↗
  • Who funds BALLET LUBBOCK ↗
  • Who funds EREMOS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX28.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Kershaw Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Hegi Family Foundation · Lee Ann and Steven Van Amburgh Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Harry Bass Foundation · The Bill & Katie Weaver Charitable Trust · The Rosewood Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kathrine M & James H Milam Family Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kathrine M & James H Milam Family Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kathrine M & James H Milam Family Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph