Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chilcote Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$1.1MArts & Culture$275kCommunity Improvement$161kEducation$21kHealth$15kCivil Rights$5kReligion$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $215k
$215,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$652k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTFUL OHIO INC$215,000
ROFANT CLUB$2,275
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONSERVANCY FOR CVNP: $25k → 13%ARTFUL OHIO INC: $215k → 16%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $3k → 17%US MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $3k → 9%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $3k → 10%CONSERVANCY FOR CUY VALLEY NP: $3k → 13%EPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $4k → 17%US MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $3k → 9%EPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $4k → 17%US MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $3k → 9%EPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $3k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%LITERARY CLEVELAND: $8k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $1k → 17%FUTURE HEIGHTS INC: $15k → 17%FUTURE HEIGHTS INC: $15k → 17%URBAN OAK SCHOOL: $10k → 17%FAIRMONT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 17%COVENTRY PEACE: $1k → 17%ARTFUL OHIO: $1k → 17%REACHING HEIGHTS: $1k → 17%BUILDING BRIDGES ART COLLABORATIVE: $8k → 17%LAND STUDIO INC: $4k → 17%LAND STUDIO INC: $4k → 17%LAND STUDIO INC: $3k → 17%COVENTRY ENHANCING CHILDS ENVRNMT: $5k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $500k → 17%FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE: $61k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $230k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NET: $30k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $210k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NET: $20k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $65k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY GROWTH NETWO: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $50k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY GROWTH NETWO: $10k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE: $1k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE: $1k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE: $1k → 17%INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $13k → 17%INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $13k → 17%UNIVERSITY CIRCLE: $3k → 17%ROFANT CLUB: $2k → 17%INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $2k → 17%UNIVERSITY CIRCLE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+162%

Still filing today

58%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +44%
  • AO
    ARTFUL OHIO INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $216k · revenue +133%
  • FI
    FutureHeights Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • FF
    FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue +263%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • UO
    URBAN OAK SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Land Cle

The Land is a local news startup that reports on Clevelands neighborhoods and inner ring suburbs. We deliver in-depth stories that foster accountability, inform the community, and inspire people to take action.

Arts & Culture
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
4
Midtown Cleveland Inc

Midtown cleveland, inc. leverages its diverse assets to create a dynamic neighborhood that unites cleveland's downtown and innovation districts.

Community Improvement
5
The Cleveland Institute of Art

The mission statement of the cleveland institute of art is as follows: to cultivate creative leaders who inspire people, strengthen communities, and contribute to a thriving and sustainable economy through an innovative education in art…

Education
6
Engage Cleveland Inc

Our mission is to attract, engage and retain emerging diverse talent to Greater Cleveland.

Community Improvement
7
Northern Ohio Youth Orchestra Inc

The Northern Ohio Youth Orchestra provides exceptional musical education through a variety of performance opportunities for young musicians of all backgrounds in an inclusive community of learning and growth.

8
Greater Cleveland Media Development Corporation

To promote the increase of media production in Northeast Ohio using effective strategies for attraction and workforce development including building an artistic infrastructure through film, achieve increased economic development in…

Philanthropy
9
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
10
Cleveland Development Foundation

Developing and improving Cleveland Ohio's civic visions.

Community Improvement
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Citymusic Cleveland Inc

Citymusic cleveland is a professional chamber orchestra, which performs free concerts throughout n.e. ohio, accompanied by art shows of local artists. our mission is to develop audiences & build communities through the arts by presenting…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Land Studio Inc and the most unlike its peers is Western Reserve Chorale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY SCHOOL — $1,058,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL+3 more — $11,000 · EducationARTFUL OHIO INC — $216,000 · Arts & CultureARTFUL OHIO INCFutureHeights Inc — $30,000 · Arts & CultureFutureHeights Inc+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NET — $50,000 · OtherMANUFACTURING…INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL — $26,500 · OtherINLET DANCE T…Individual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual gr…MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY GROWTH NETWO — $20,000 · OtherMANUFACTURING…LAND STUDIO INC — $11,000 · OtherLAND STUDIO I…URBAN OAK SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherEPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO — $9,500 · OtherUS MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT — $7,500 · OtherBUILDING BRIDGES ART COLLABORATIVE — $7,500 · Other+6 more — $21,025 · Other+6 moreFUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $60,500 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED — $3,500 · Community Improvement
Education$1,069,000Arts & Culture$249,000Other$188,025Community Improvement$64,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL — $1,058,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetFUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $60,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFutureHeights Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetLAND STUDIO INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACHING HEIGHTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
  • Who funds ARTFUL OHIO INC
  • Who funds FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO
  • Who funds FutureHeights Inc
  • Who funds LAND STUDIO INC
  • Who funds Literary Cleveland
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College
  • Who funds REACHING HEIGHTS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Gund FoundationOH15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Gund Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · George Codrington Fdnhirtlena · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chilcote Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chilcote Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chilcote Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph