Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kaplan Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$36kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$6kFood & Nutrition$5kEmployment$4kEducation$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION$2,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
SCHOOL OF CREATIVE & PERFORMING ARTS (SCPA)$2,000
AUTISM CONNECTIONS$1,400
ST JUDE$1,000
PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (PSPCA)$500
LOHIMILLER FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$58k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+3%

Still filing today

63%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
PhilanthropyAnimalsHealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +9%
  • TJ
    THE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2026 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • HO
    Hospice of Michigan Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS & CREATIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • M2
    Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -24%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
2
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc

The mission of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries (Goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. Not charity, but a chance.

Employment
6
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
7
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
8
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
9
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
10
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
11
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
12
The Halo Trust (Usa) Inc

To protect lives and restore livelihoods of people affected by conflict: 1) to protect lives from the explosive threats and hazards resulting from conflict, 2) to reduce human suffering from armed violence and 3) to build resilient and…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Animal Rescue; the most unlike its peers is Women Walking West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPCA: $20,500 · OtherSPCASCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS & CREATIVE ARTS: $5,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS & CREATIVE ARTSGenesis at Work Foundation: $4,000 · OtherGenesis at Work FoundationABILITIES FIRST: $2,640 · OtherABILITIES FIRSTST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2,425 · OtherSCHOOL OF CREATIVE & PERFORMING ARTS (SCPA): $2,000 · Other+13 more: $9,388 · Other+13 morePennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $15,700 · AnimalsPennsylvania Society …+1 more: $250 · AnimalsTHE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION: $9,500 · PhilanthropyTHE JEFF RUBY…THE LOHMILLER FOUNDATION INC: $400 · PhilanthropyMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $3,200 · InternationalHospice of Michigan Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationWomen Walking West: $250 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,590 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 · HealthFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$45,953Animals$15,950Philanthropy$9,900International$3,200Human Services$3,000Education$2,250Health$2,090Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $15,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGenesis at Work Foundation: $4,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,590 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOHMILLER FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen Walking West: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPittsburgh Italian Scholarship Fund: $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
  • Who funds THE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Genesis at Work Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOHMILLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Women Walking West ↗
  • Who funds Pittsburgh Italian Scholarship Fund ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kaplan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kaplan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kaplan Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Kaplan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kaplan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph