Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kaplan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Animals$36kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$6kFood & Nutrition$5kEmployment$4kEducation$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$103k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION$5,000
PSPCA$4,500
GENESIS AT WORK FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$55k · 7 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$55k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+35%

Still filing today

57%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +9%
  • TJ
    THE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +26%
  • HO
    Hospice of Michigan Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS & CREATIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • M2
    Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -24%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
2
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

4
Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc

The mission of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries (Goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. Not charity, but a chance.

Employment
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
7
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
10
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
11
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

12
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Animal Rescue and the most unlike its peers is Women Walking West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPCA — $20,500 · OtherSPCASCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS & CREATIVE ARTS — $5,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS & CREATIVE ARTSGenesis at Work Foundation — $4,000 · OtherGenesis at Work FoundationABILITIES FIRST — $2,640 · OtherABILITIES FIRSTST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL — $2,425 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL+10 more — $6,488 · Other+10 morePennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $15,700 · AnimalsPennsylvania Society for…+1 more — $250 · AnimalsTHE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION — $7,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEFF R…+1 more — $200 · PhilanthropyMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $3,200 · InternationalHospice of Michigan Inc — $3,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,590 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $500 · HealthFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionWomen Walking West — $250 · Education
Other$41,053Animals$15,950Philanthropy$7,200International$3,200Human Services$3,000Health$2,090Food & Nutrition$1,500Education$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $15,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGenesis at Work Foundation — $4,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,590 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen Walking West — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOHMILLER FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPittsburgh Italian Scholarship Fund — $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
  • Who funds THE JEFF RUBY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Genesis at Work Foundation
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds Women Walking West
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds THE LOHMILLER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Pittsburgh Italian Scholarship Fund

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kaplan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kaplan Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Kaplan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph