Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kalyani Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$112kEducation$37kFood & Nutrition$22kHuman Services$22kArts & Culture$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kEmployment$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,554
Median grant
2
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,554
PBS SoCal$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($165k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($39k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%American Red Cross: $130 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $4k → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $3k → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $1k → 14%Beverly Hills Womens Club: $1k → 14%Beverly Hills Womens Club: $850 → 14%BEVERLY HILLS WOMENS CLUB: $605 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($39k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$30k · 3 grants
India$9k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 17 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
45

Total granted

$158k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+34%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Beverly Hills Womens Club
    6× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +23%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +112%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • MA
    MANALTHEERAM AYURVEDIC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
2
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Westside Food Bank

Westside food bank addresses hunger in west los angeles county, an area that is home to over one million people. our partner agencies operate food assistance programs in culver city, inglewood, the lax area, malibu, santa monica, venice,…

Food & Nutrition
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
10
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
11
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
12
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank for New York City; the most unlike its peers is Kali Mandir. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OBJETS D'ART AND SPIRIT: $60,000 · OtherOBJETS D'ART AND SPIRITObjects D'Art and Spirit: $30,000 · OtherObjects D'Art and SpiritThe Sunflower School: $30,000 · OtherThe Sunflower School+49 more: $64,402 · Other+49 moreBeverly Hills Womens Club: $10,765 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $130 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $1,015 · Public Safety & DisasterGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFeeding America: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $500 · HealthEAST-WEST PLAYERS INC: $1,245 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,200 · Education
Other$184,402Human Services$11,395Public Safety & Disaster$2,015Food & Nutrition$2,000Health$1,500Arts & Culture$1,245Education$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBeverly Hills Womens Club: $10,765 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetRACE TO ERASE MS: $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST-WEST PLAYERS INC: $1,245 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $1,015 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNEAKERS FOR SOLDIERS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE GUILD OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALI MANDIR: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Beverly Hills Womens Club ↗
  • Who funds RACE TO ERASE MS ↗
  • Who funds EAST-WEST PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds SNEAKERS FOR SOLDIERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE GUILD OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kalyani Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kalyani Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kalyani’s filings →

More from the funding graph