Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kalt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$148k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$946kHealth$735kPhilanthropy$537kFood & Nutrition$138kArts & Culture$131kInternational$121kReligion$107kCivil Rights$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$67,500
SANTA BARBARA FOOD BANK$25,000
NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY$15,750
CONGREGATION BNAI BRITH$10,495
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,516
AFISCD$5,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
LAKEVIEW PANTRY$2,500
MISSION SCHOLARS$2,500
DIRECT RELIEF$2,000
SANTA BARBARA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL$1,084
SANTA BARBARA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,030
KESHET$1,000
NYC MARATHON - NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%NAMM FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK: $3k → 14%NAMM FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $1k → 14%JARC: $10k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $3k → 8%JARC: $3k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%PILSEN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 45 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
66

Total granted

$2.6M
$301k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

60%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $464k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2017–2019 · $160k · revenue +202% · 38% of their budget
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NS
    NORTH SHORE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +69%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dream Hustle Code. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/73
Grantees still filing
43/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $483,316 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUniversity of Michigan: $160,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganCRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $83,500 · OtherCRANBROOK SCHOOLSRAVINIA: $58,466 · OtherNORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY: $56,250 · OtherAM SHALOM: $50,000 · Other+85 more: $537,930 · Other+85 moreSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION: $580,000 · EducationSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATIONDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago: $47,500 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+8 more: $32,018 · EducationJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $463,749 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND …UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $20,641 · Philanthropy+4 more: $19,048 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $55,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $15,150 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,822 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · International+4 more: $8,022 · InternationalJARC: $31,000 · Human ServicesNAMM Foundation A Not-For-Profit Corporation: $12,500 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $12,188 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $39,000 · Food & NutritionFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $15,000 · Food & NutritionDARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB: $27,799 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,429,462Education$759,518Philanthropy$503,438International$100,994Human Services$65,188Food & Nutrition$54,000Recreation & Sports$27,799

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION: $580,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $463,749 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $160,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $39,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $38,125 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJARC: $31,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB: $27,799 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $20,641 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $17,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $15,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,822 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMM Foundation A Not-For-Profit Corporation: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $12,188 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $10,298 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSoul Children of Chicago Inc: $7,771 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Jazz Philharmonic: $5,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,227 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $5,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLENCOE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAPSCORPS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHEAL THE OCEAN INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUPSTART BAY AREA: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIGNITE WORLDWIDE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds DARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAZZY ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds NAMM Foundation A Not-For-Profit Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL16.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Dancing Tides Foundation Inc · Mosher Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Brittingham Family Foundation · Manitou Fund · United Jewish Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kalt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kalt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kalt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph