Skip to content
The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.1MEducation$50kEnvironment$50kHuman Services$30kSocial Science$1k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $290k
  • $250k+2 grants · $730k
$190,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$24M
Total assets

Largely a single collection: about 91% of reported assets are Photographs And Films.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$410,000
BROOKLYN MUSEUM$320,000
THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$190,000
DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ART$100,000
ANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES$23,704
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ART: $50k → 10%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $410k → 16%INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES UCSC: $50k → 13%BLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER: $30k → 11%WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $25k → 17%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $320k → 20%THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $89k → 16%THE ASPEN INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ART: $100k → 21%THE ROSS MUSEUM: $30k → 5%ALLEN MEMORIAL ART MUSEUM: $50k → 13%THE MACDOWELL COLONY: $30k → 7%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $190k → 17%THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $30k → 20%THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $70k → 16%THE ASPEN INSTITUTEARTIST ENDOWED FOUNDATION INITIATIVE: $500 → 14%THE LIBRARY OF AMERICA: $100k → 17%THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $30k → 16%ANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $337k → 17%ANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $123k → 17%THE GREY ART GALLERY: $50k → 17%ANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $24k → 17%HOPE AND HEROES COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $30k → 17%THE DRAWING CENTER: $30k → 17%THE MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 37%.

The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
3
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
4
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of the Moving Image

See schedule omuseum of the moving image (momi) is the only museum in the u.s. that explores the central technology of the present moment.screens are all around us. we use them to educate, entertain, and communicate. the moving…

Arts & Culture
6
Berggruen Institute
Education
7
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
8
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
9
Art Explorium
—
10
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
The Long Island Museum of American Art History & Carriages

The long island museum is dedicated to inspiring people of all ages with an understanding and enjoyment of american art, history and carriages as expressed through the heritage of long island and its diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences; the most unlike its peers is Blue Mountain Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $410,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ARTSTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $320,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCESMuseum of Modern Art: $190,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $188,500 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTONTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTSTHE LITERARY CLASSICS OF THE US INC D/B/A LIBRARY OF AMERICA: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LITERARY CLASSICS OF THE US INC D/B/A LIBRARY OF AMERICA+4 more: $115,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $483,820 · EducationANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVESTHE GREY ART GALLERY: $50,000 · OtherTHE GREY ART GAL…ADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ART: $50,000 · OtherADDISON GALLERY …ALLEN MEMORIAL ART MUSEUM: $50,000 · OtherALLEN MEMORIAL A…INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES UCSC: $50,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF ART…BLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER: $30,000 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN CE…THE ROSS MUSEUM: $30,000 · OtherTHE ROSS MUSEUMHOPE AND HEROES COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherHOPE AND HEROES …MARIAN AND EDWARD MACDOWELL INC: $30,000 · OtherMARIAN AND EDWAR…+1 more: $500 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · Social Science
Arts & Culture$1,423,500Education$483,820Other$320,500Social Science$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $483,820 over 3y, 26% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $410,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $320,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $190,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $188,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITERARY CLASSICS OF THE US INC D/B/A LIBRARY OF AMERICA: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE DRAWING CENTER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARIAN AND EDWARD MACDOWELL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc?

Find your warmest path to The June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on June Leaf and Robert Frank Fdn Inc F/K/A the Andrea Frank Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home